The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2524 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering two instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
This document is a revised strategy for Environmental Standards Scotland and is subject to a bespoke procedure for parliamentary consideration under the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Continuity) (Scotland) Act 2021.
Paragraph 1 of schedule 2 of the 2021 act contains a detailed list of information that the strategy must set out, concerning how ESS intends to go about its work. It appears to the committee that some of the required information is not included in the strategy.
Some of the information appears to be contained instead in separate guidance that ESS has produced. The 2021 act requires all of that information to be in the strategy that is laid before the Parliament. Putting the information in a separate document, which is published on ESS’s website, does not fulfil that requirement.
Accordingly, does the committee wish to report the strategy on the general reporting ground, in that some of the information required by paragraph 1 of schedule 2 does not appear to be contained in the revised strategy?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee also wish to highlight to the lead committee in its report a more minor point—that the revised strategy suggests that ESS scrutinises all organisations that perform functions of a public nature, without making clear that there are exceptions to that?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
The next meeting of the committee will take place on Tuesday 11 November.
Meeting closed at 09:32.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
A main point that has come up in my discussions with constituents and organisations over the past four years has been about coercion. Notwithstanding Mr McArthur’s comments a moment ago—he may come in if he wishes to—about terms being well defined and well recognised and about the guidance, I lodged my amendments 216 and 217 to try to have something in the bill that would give the wider public a full understanding of the situation. We all recognise that although this is—technically—a normal bill going through the parliamentary process, the subject matter is not normal subject matter.
A point that has come up a number of times in discussions is that the smallest hint of disapproval from a loved one—the quiet suggestion that an individual is a burden, or even the unspoken weight of financial or emotional strain—can influence a person’s decision in ways that are almost impossible to measure. Bob Doris spoke powerfully about the aspect of feeling like a burden. If coercion or pressure goes undetected, people may die—not because they wish to but because they feel that they ought to. Amendments 216 and 217 would address the gap by introducing clear definitions of coercion and pressure in section 29.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
I appreciate the points that Liam McArthur makes. My amendments may seem unnecessary and, to judge by Mr McArthur’s points, potentially confusing from a legal perspective. However, I think that they are very much worthy of being discussed at stage 2. If they were not acceptable to Mr McArthur—the committee could decide on them later—I would be content not to move them and to work with Mr McArthur on something else for stage 3.
Because of the subject matter, this is more than just a normal bill. I genuinely believe that having social consensus will be extremely important if the bill is passed at stage 3 and becomes an act of Parliament.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
I am happy to take Mr McArthur’s intervention.