Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 15 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2194 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

That is helpful.

I turn to governance. Paragraph 30 of your report seems to demonstrate that there was poor communication and that some individuals failed to carry out the roles that were expected of them. Given that two years have elapsed since the issue came to light, are you assured that steps have been taken to ensure that such a situation will not arise again?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

Before I ask those questions, I want to go back to the line of questioning from Colin Beattie and Graham Simpson. Bearing in mind that various lockdowns took place between 2020 and May 2023, was Covid ever brought up during your audit work and engagement with the college? It did not come up in the report, and it has not come up so far in this evidence session.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

That is certainly something that would be worth while to look at if you could send that to the committee—thank you.

Paragraphs 32 to 37 of your report cover the complex issues that relate to the qualified opinion on the college’s accounts. Can you provide further detail on the key stakeholders that the college reported those issues to?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

Can you provide further detail on the three recommendations from the lessons learned report that are being implemented on an on-going basis? What progress is being made?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

That is helpful—thank you.

Paragraph 39 of the report states:

“The annual audit report 2022/23 concluded that, with the exception of the issues related to the project, Forth Valley College has effective arrangements in place for financial planning, governance and performance management.”

That sounds a wee bit contradictory—it certainly contradicts what we have heard this morning. How can the arrangements that were in place at the time have been effective if they enabled the situation that has arisen?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

In December 2024, the board of management agreed that the dual role held by the vice-principal of finance and corporate affairs as secretary to the board of management should continue, despite the board acknowledging that the arrangement does not comply with the “Code of Good Governance for Scotland’s Colleges”. Do you know why the board of management took that decision?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

I am certainly not using that as any type of mitigating factor, but 2020 was a huge shock for everyone and affected how we went about our normal business and, when I was reading the report, I considered whether that was part of any attempt not to follow due process.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Negative Procedure

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 2, we are considering four instruments. Points have been raised on three of them. The committee asked questions of the Scottish Government in relation to all four instruments, and the full correspondence has been published alongside the papers for this meeting.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Negative Procedure

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

The instrument makes amendments to the Education (Appeal Committee Procedures) (Scotland) Regulations 1982, which govern school admission and exclusion appeal hearings in Scotland. The committee asked a question about the enabling powers, specifically why section 28H(5) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 was not cited. The Scottish Government acknowledged that that section should have been cited as an enabling power, but considers that its omission does not affect the validity of the instrument.

Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground of a failure to follow proper drafting practice, in that section 28H(5) of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 has not been cited as an enabling power in the preamble?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instrument not subject to Parliamentary Procedure

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Stuart McMillan

Is the committee content with the instrument??

Members indicated agreement.