The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2221 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
One element that has come up in the short time since I have been back on this committee is the issue of people coming and going within those bodies. I understand that there are a wide range of factors as to why someone leaves a particular role and moves on to a different role. It is also very common within the civil service for staff to be shuffled around. However, in relation to sponsorship arrangements and the folk who work purely in that sphere, I would be keen to explore whether there could be some mechanism whereby, if staff have built up an expertise and are considered to be high performers in that area, the normal rules would not apply and they would see out a particular project instead of moving on to something else. Personal circumstances will obviously dictate that as well, but we would want folk who are doing a very good job to remain in that role and see a project through.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
You are also looking at the sponsorship arrangements with the Scottish Government. The committee is keen to get a bit more information about that range of activity, too.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
In Scotland, the process is about best value, not what is cheapest. I do not imagine that you have somebody who has worked in shipbuilding working in Audit Scotland—you will know the answer to that; I do not—but I genuinely think that, with regard to the best-value approach, you will be looking at contracts not solely in terms of the numbers but with regard to the number of staff contractors who have been brought in and who have been let go, as well as the range of salaries that were on offer. We all recognise the additional costs that have been borne by the taxpayer—for the building of the Glen Sannox, certainly, but now also for the Glen Rosa. The lessons learned element is hugely important in that regard, and looking at the external contractors would be a good starting point and worth while.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
You spoke about the variables that we are all working with at the moment, and you touched on the global factors. I am keen to have a better understanding of the picture. I know that your audits are based on the past but that you also look ahead, so what forecasting activity will you undertake with regard to service delivery in the light of the global factors and economic shocks that are impacting the Scottish and UK economies?
I have one particular example in mind. When the US President made his recent announcement, financial markets took a hit for a number of days. They came back a wee bit, but anyone who retired at that point would have seen their pension funds take a hit, which will have affected them, and some of those individuals will then be required to utilise more public services and to do so sooner than they would have planned.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Everyone will be very much aware of the work that Audit Scotland has undertaken with regard to the Glen Sannox and the Glen Rosa. You are also planning to produce a performance report in February next year. Can you provide further information with regard to the specifics that you will be looking at in that future work?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Before I bring in Rona Mackay, I have a question on the comment that you made a moment ago about the rigid rules offering no flexibility, in contrast to common law, which does have flexibility. The purpose of this type of legislation, and other bills that the committee has looked at, is to update the law and to try to respond to the change that has taken place in society compared to when the legislation was first put in place, in order to help the economy. From what is in the bill and the engagement that you have had through your work as a commissioner, will the new rules assist businesses to ensure that they can become more competitive and help Scotland’s economy?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is true. Thank you very much.
09:45Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 14th meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. We have received apologies today from the deputy convener, Bill Kidd; in his place, I welcome Rona Mackay.
I remind everyone to switch off or put to silent mobile phones and electronic devices.
The first item of business is to decide whether to take items 5, 6, 7 and 8 in private. Is the committee content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.