Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2261 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Does the committee wish to highlight its correspondence with the Scottish Government to the lead committee in respect of the matters that are discussed in questions 1 and 2?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Does the committee wish to note that the Scottish Government has advised that it will take action to correct the points that are raised in questions 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Does the committee wish to highlight its correspondence with the Government to the lead committee, and is the committee otherwise content with the instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments not subject to Parliamentary Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 4, we are considering two instruments, on which no points have been raised.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Does the committee wish to highlight its correspondence to the lead committee, noting that the Scottish Government intends to correct the errors in the signing copy of the instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

I have a supplementary question. Does the Scottish Government have any figures on the number of leases that it is estimated would come to an end and come under the new law, if it is passed? How many leases would be covered by that? In addition, do you have any figures on circumstances in which leases have been lost and different folk are involved?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

A range of commitments have been made to come back to the committee with information, so we will get those responses from you—thank you for that.

I thank the minister and her officials for their evidence. The committee might follow up in writing with any further questions after our final discussions.

That concludes the public part of the meeting.

10:56 Meeting continued in private until 11:42.  

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Okay. I call Jeremy Balfour.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Thank you, minister. I will open the questioning before handing over to colleagues.

Will you explain the general rationale behind the bill and how you think the proposed changes will benefit landlords and tenants as well as the economy generally?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

What you have indicated, particularly at the end, ties in with my next question. Is that the reason why the decision was made to attempt to codify the law in the way that is suggested in the bill, instead of, for example, abolishing tacit relocation or only amending parts of the law that are not working well?