The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2327 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
The purpose of the instrument is to give effect to the recommendations in a Boundaries Scotland report on its review of the boundaries of the Scottish Parliament’s constituencies and regions.
The committee asked the Scottish Government about an issue arising in the instrument’s preamble, which suggests that both the draft order and the report require approval by resolution in the Parliament. The report requires only to be laid, and there is no requirement in the parent act for a motion to approve it.
In its response, the Scottish Government agreed that the report does not require approval and stated its intention to correct the preamble to make the position clear before the draft instrument is submitted to His Majesty in council.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground because of the error in the preamble?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful.
I turn to governance. Paragraph 30 of your report seems to demonstrate that there was poor communication and that some individuals failed to carry out the roles that were expected of them. Given that two years have elapsed since the issue came to light, are you assured that steps have been taken to ensure that such a situation will not arise again?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Before I ask those questions, I want to go back to the line of questioning from Colin Beattie and Graham Simpson. Bearing in mind that various lockdowns took place between 2020 and May 2023, was Covid ever brought up during your audit work and engagement with the college? It did not come up in the report, and it has not come up so far in this evidence session.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
I am certainly not using that as any type of mitigating factor, but 2020 was a huge shock for everyone and affected how we went about our normal business and, when I was reading the report, I considered whether that was part of any attempt not to follow due process.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is certainly something that would be worth while to look at if you could send that to the committee—thank you.
Paragraphs 32 to 37 of your report cover the complex issues that relate to the qualified opinion on the college’s accounts. Can you provide further detail on the key stakeholders that the college reported those issues to?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Can you provide further detail on the three recommendations from the lessons learned report that are being implemented on an on-going basis? What progress is being made?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful—thank you.
Paragraph 39 of the report states:
“The annual audit report 2022/23 concluded that, with the exception of the issues related to the project, Forth Valley College has effective arrangements in place for financial planning, governance and performance management.”
That sounds a wee bit contradictory—it certainly contradicts what we have heard this morning. How can the arrangements that were in place at the time have been effective if they enabled the situation that has arisen?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
In December 2024, the board of management agreed that the dual role held by the vice-principal of finance and corporate affairs as secretary to the board of management should continue, despite the board acknowledging that the arrangement does not comply with the “Code of Good Governance for Scotland’s Colleges”. Do you know why the board of management took that decision?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
The purpose of this instrument is to change employee contribution rates by amending the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) Regulations 2015 (SSI 2015/19). The committee asked whether the title of the instrument should in fact be the “Firefighters Pension Scheme (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025”. The Scottish Government agreed that that would be the more appropriate title. It regretted the departure from drafting convention but considered that the meaning, understanding or effect of the instrument would not be affected by the form of the title in this case.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, in respect of the fact that its title is not in line with drafting convention?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee also wish to note that the Scottish Government intends to correct a minor cross-referencing error identified by the committee as soon as possible, through a correction slip?
Members indicated agreement.