The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2246 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
I will go back to something that was touched upon earlier, regarding the centre for pandemic preparedness. The language used by the advisory panel was highlighted—in particular, the use of the word “centre.” Can you clarify whether you are considering setting up a building somewhere as a centre, or whether it will be more flexible than that?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Thank you, convener. I have no interests to declare.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Has the network—I will use “network” rather than “centre”—had full support from the private sector thus far in your engagement?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
You touched on the issue of complacency earlier. The language that is used for the public is hugely important. There are politicians in the Scottish Parliament who 12 months ago claimed that the pandemic was over, but that is clearly not the case; there are still people going to hospital with Covid. Politicians have a role to play.
In relation to what you just said about the private sector—I accept that it is a broad term—if there is a sense of cooling from the private sector about looking ahead, that is a concern. Is the private sector purely thinking about a profit opportunity in the future, or does it want to engage in that dialogue?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
I could not agree more regarding the partnership approach.
My final question is regarding the network. You touched on it earlier in answer to Brian Whittle’s question about bureaucracy. Looking at the confidentiality issue with the data, could the network that is being considered be the mechanism to access the data from the different health board areas in Scotland? That could guarantee confidentiality but also provide the information that is required to assist with any research.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
We seem to have lost Jeremy Balfour.
We can come back to Jeremy if he wants to come back on that point.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
As we have no further questions for the panel, I thank Lady Paton and Lord Drummond Young for their extremely helpful evidence. The committee may follow up by letter with any additional questions stemming from today’s meeting. There are also a couple of action points for you to come back to the committee on.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Yes. That is no problem at all.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
Yes. Once again, I thank both of you for coming. I will suspend the meeting briefly to allow the witnesses to leave the room.
11:59 Meeting suspended.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Stuart McMillan
We move on to questions on sections 25 and 26. We have received a variety of responses on the provision of information under those sections. Some concern was expressed regarding the level of information that could be provided.
We had some comments from Anderson Strathern, which said that it felt that the provisions
“have been drawn too widely and places too onerous a duty on trustees to provide information.”
Gillespie Macandrew LLP thought that the provisions could
“open the door to increased litigation by disappointed potential beneficiaries for whom receipt of information on the existence of the trust might lead to an expectation of a benefit thereunder.”
In view of those and other comments that the committee has received, do you wish to offer any reflections on the policy underpinning the provisions at this stage?