The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2261 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful—thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 18th meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to switch off or put to silent their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is a decision on taking business in private. Is the committee content to take items 4 and 5 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
In relation to statutory instrument 2025/555, does the committee wish to welcome that the Scottish Government, in order to address an issue that the committee raised, intends to amend an aspect of its policy note on the SI and an aspect of the policy note on Scottish statutory instrument Recognition of Overseas Qualifications (Charges) (Scotland) Regulations 2025 (SSI 2025/67)?
Members indicated agreement.
10:01 Meeting continued in private until 10:37.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering eight instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Also, have you taken on any additional staff to deal with the FOI requests?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
More generally.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Building a commercial ship is different from building a naval ship—that comment is continually heard. I have not yet had the opportunity to meet the new chief executive, but I know that that is being worked on.
I am asking these questions because the FMI reports are very clear about some of the challenges. One of the reports says that new cost forecasting processes appear to be adequate and an improvement on previous systems, but that that is clearly reliant on there being accurate drawings, design and engineering information.
There will be some questions about the Glen Rosa and the announcement that has been made in the past couple of weeks. However, as the report highlights, there are still challenges. That is not helpful, to say the least. It is not helpful in terms of the yard’s future. Notwithstanding the strengthening of the board, that raises questions about the strength of the board beforehand. I am not casting aspersions on any individual, but, with regard to the board as an entity, it shows a complete lack of leadership at board level to scrutinise what is actually taking place on the shop floor and what is happening with regard to the management of the yard. I genuinely have concerns about that, because the fact is that it has just lost two orders.