The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2313 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
The instrument creates exemptions from NHS charges for people who come to the United Kingdom for medical treatment under the Gaza medical evacuation scheme and for people who are authorised to accompany them, if the need for treatment arose during the visit.
This instrument falls to be reported to the Parliament under reporting ground (j), for a failure to lay the instrument in accordance with section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010. The instrument was laid on 7 October 2025 and came into force on the next day, breaching the 28-day rule in the 2010 act, which requires that a negative instrument must be laid before the Scottish Parliament at least 28 days before it comes into force.
The 2010 act requires the Scottish Government to explain to the Presiding Officer why the laying requirements have not been complied with. The Scottish Government explained, in its letter dated 7 October, that the instrument was being brought into force on the next day in order to provide clarity to those who are responsible for making and recovering charges from overseas visitors, and to provide assurance to those who are in Scotland under the Gaza medical evacuation operation that no children under that operation or their accompanying persons will be charged for NHS services.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament under reporting ground (j), for failure to comply with laying requirements, as it was not laid 28 counting days before it comes into force?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
That would be helpful. Thank you.
I see that colleagues have no further questions, so do you have any final comments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 5, we are taking evidence from Graeme Dey MSP, the Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans. This is one of our regular sessions with the minister on the aspects of Scottish Government work that are relevant to the committee. I welcome the minister back to his role and to the committee.
The minister is accompanied by three Scottish Government officials: Steven MacGregor, head of the Parliament and legislation unit; Claire Trail, SSI and UK legislation team leader; and Douglas Kerr, deputy legislation co-ordinator in the Scottish Government legal department. I welcome them all to the meeting and remind them not to worry about the microphones, which are controlled by our broadcasting colleagues and will come on automatically.
I invite the minister to make some opening remarks.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
That was helpful. Thank you.
On a related matter, an unusual issue has arisen in recent months with amending instruments that have not addressed all the issues that the Scottish Government undertook to correct, and which have actually introduced further problems. You have already touched on the overarching checking process, but does that also cover this type of situation, in which something that has already come to the committee, and which we have highlighted, has had to go back to the Government to be looked at again? Is there a separate process for that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering one instrument, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the reasons provided for the failure to comply with the laying requirements?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
Also under this agenda item, no issues have been raised on the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
Indeed. I am just considering that element. Ms Trail touched a moment ago on the timescales of bills, and the LCMs, that might be coming forward, but could the Parliament end up in the position of not being able to scrutinise some of that legislation at all?
10:45Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the proposed draft order?
Members indicated agreement.
10:04 Meeting suspended.