Seòmar agus comataidhean

We are currently considering the recommendations. That sits within another portfolio, but I will get you a proper, detailed update on that.

I thank everyone for all their good wishes. I am glad to be back, too. It is good to be here. I hope that you are feeling better, Pam.

Three great reports were published last week, including the Inclusion Scotland report and the UN’s guide report. With all the reports, we are considering the impact of Covid and the areas in which we can tackle the associated inequalities.

I have been really pleased to see the work that disabled people’s organisations are doing around incorporation of the UNCRPD—it is something that I have been advocating for for a long time, personally, professionally and politically.

The human rights bill process is under way and will be led by the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government, Shona Robison. I chair the advisory board for that, and we have learned lessons from the work of the social renewal advisory board and the national advisory council on women and girls. We are hosting a number of opportunities to hear from stakeholders. You will not be surprised to hear that disabled people’s organisations are front and centre in that. I know Glasgow Disability Alliance and the work that it does. Like you, Pam, I herald the work of the GDA and other organisations, and hold that work in high regard.

The GDA and others have been pivotal in the work that we are doing in developing the policy around the bill. They have contributed to the advisory board and have considered some of the intersections with disability, including those relating to race and age. We are working on all of that.

To get to the crux of your question, which is about how we ensure that such organisations are adequately funded, we are not quite sure yet what they need and what we will do as far as incorporation of the UNCRDP goes. We are at quite an early stage in that work and in understanding what that will look like. However, the bill will incorporate several treaties into Scots law and will give people a remedy so that they can challenge public authorities when their rights are not being respected. That is a huge shift in how we do things.

You would think that, as a Government, we would be quite nervous about that, but actually we are fully centred on ensuring that we create a Scotland where people have a judicial route to realise their rights. We hope that they will never have to use such a route because all the other work that we are doing emphasises the responsibilities on public authorities to deliver. However, it is a real step forward for people to know that such a remedy is there and that they can use it, and for public authorities to know that they have responsibilities that they must act on or they could be challenged in court.

The advisory board has started to meet again—I met the board a few weeks ago. It is looking at a whole host of issues in relation to incorporation but there is a question about how far we can go within our devolution settlement. There are challenges; it is a huge piece of work, but one that we have entered into with open hearts and minds as well as lots of drive and determination. Disabled people’s organisations are incredibly important in helping us to understand that. They are there at the beginning so that they get the outcomes that they need at the end.

I will update the committee as we develop that work on the question that Pam Duncan-Glancy is asking, which is one that I like to ask: what difference will it make and how do we ensure that it works? That is where we are focusing right now and we will come back to the committee on that.

Absolutely. We are tackling all of that in a few ways. We published the Gypsy Traveller action plan in October 2019, and we got into doing quite rapid work on that. Then Covid hit, and we had to pivot everything that we had into ensuring that we could support Gypsy Travellers in communities, with temporary sites, negotiated stopping places and sanitation. All of that had to be put in place. We set up an action group to do that, working alongside stakeholders, the community and our colleagues in local government. We were able to pivot and put that support in place very quickly, and actually deal with some issues that had been on-going for a very long time regarding new sites and negotiated stopping places. We have learned a lot from all of that, and we intend to apply that learning to the work that we are doing now.

Getting to your point on the worries about sustainability, I had a community conversation just two weeks ago—we have those conversations very regularly—and we then had a joint ministerial group meeting with community representatives last week. We are bang up to date on all of this and on all the concerns. The committee’s work last week complemented all of that, as you heard the comments that were made and discussed the priorities, which was incredibly important.

We have re-established that work. The plan was set for two years, but that two years has been eaten up by Covid. We agreed to extend it to October, and I am now having conversations with the community about how much further we can extend work on the action plan. That means that the joint ministerial group, which is jointly chaired with our colleagues in COSLA, will remain in place to drive the work across all the areas where we need to drive the changes.

We have made lots of progress. I have a list of the many things that we have done, which I will quickly run through.

The Gypsy Traveller accommodation fund, which contained an initial £2 million, has now been spent, and we are waiting for local authorities to give us an update on the progress that we have made there.

We identified the Gypsy Traveller community’s accommodation needs in “Housing to 2040”, which established a £20 million fund. We have had three local authorities bid into that, and we are about to start the next phase with other local authorities. That is about “more and better” accommodation, which is the term that we use in the document.

One of the things that the Gypsy Traveller community told me at the very start was, “Things get done to us, not with us.” In my portfolio and the things that I do, the phrase “nothing about us without us” is not just a phrase; it is a working ethic. We therefore have lots of opportunities, lots of working groups and lots of stakeholder engagement to ensure that the policy development part of that work happens with people, not to them. I think that we have done that incredibly well with the Gypsy Traveller action plan.

The Gypsy Traveller community told us that sites were not designed in a culturally appropriate way. We now have a site design guide that is being used by the three local authorities that have the money, which include Clackmannanshire Council and Aberdeenshire Council. I cannot remember the other one off the top of my head, but I will come back to it. They are going to learn the lessons from that work and we can then tweak the guide to make it work even better. The community came up with ideas that are more culturally appropriate, and we said, “Why was that not done before?”

We have five new community mental health workers who were recruited from the community. People asked for that link so that the people who give them support are people from their community. We have some additional funding coming in for that.

The same applies in relation to early learning and childcare. There has been support to pivot to digital working, which has seemed to be a very successful way of learning for a lot of Gypsy Traveller children. We are learning the lessons on how we can do that, working with the Scottish Traveller Education Programme with the funding that we have put in place.

I hope that that reassures you and that you understand that the word “stagnation” is not in my dictionary when it comes to this work. We will continue to drive the work forward. In the joint ministerial group, we have health ministers, employment ministers, social security ministers and planning ministers all sitting at the same table and driving what happens across their portfolios, and I monitor that very, very often to make sure that we are making the progress that we need to make.

I am really open minded about that. I was really interested in the comment that was made last week. I am happy to take those conversations further and see how that goes.

We have the public sector equality duty, so those responsibilities are in place. We also have the review, which will be open until—I think—11 April. If stakeholders or the committee want to make contributions to that, they should do so, because the more specific, detailed contributions we get, the better the outcome will be when we set the new duty.

The community conversations that we have very regularly and the re-establishment of the joint ministerial group are key in that regard. The group will drive change from the top down at both Government level and political level, but we are also working with the community to make sure that it can drive change upwards, according to its needs, and that things are done with it, rather than to it.

I hope that all that reassures you that we take the matter extremely seriously. The public sector equality duty already exists. We are reviewing it and there is space to add details and comments. However, I am keen to investigate a bit further the comment that you referred to that was made at last week’s meeting.

Absolutely—there is a real drive and determination to limit all those inequalities. They are there, and we have a responsibility to do that.

The work that we have done on the Gypsy Traveller joint ministerial group is very important in that regard, because that model has worked incredibly well in ensuring that other ministers as well are driving those changes within their portfolios. The work of the previous committee has informed that process, as has work that we commissioned the Coalition for Racial Equality and Rights—CRER—to do, on which it published a report last year.

Rather than me pulling things out of the back of my head on what other ministers are considering doing, let me get that update for you. If you want to bring us back to discuss it at a future date, I am sure that Mr Lochhead or I would be happy to do that.

Thank you, convener. I am delighted to be here. My focus is on ensuring that the Government continues to do all that it can to address inequalities and ensure that equality and human rights become part of the fabric of how we deliver for all people in Scotland.

I am aware that the committee met Gypsy Traveller community activists last week, so I will start my comments on that topic, if you do not mind. We are continuing to implement our Gypsy Traveller action plan in partnership with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and others, and we have made much progress. Funding has been allocated to new sites; we are expanding the provision of community health workers; we are supporting young Gypsy Travellers to improve their mental health; and we are taking steps to tackle the pernicious discrimination that is still experienced by the community.

I will continue to regularly meet the community. We have community conversations, and the ministerial working group on Gipsy Travellers meets often. We listen to what matters to the community and we work with partners to translate that into practical, real and on-going change.

I am also aware that concerns were raised last week around the so-called “tinker experiment” and its impact on families. I recognise and fully acknowledge the unacceptable historical practices that have been faced by the community. I therefore announce to the committee that I will be commissioning independent research into the “tinker experiment” to ensure that we fully capture and understand its implications, identify who was involved and affected, and ensure that the community has an opportunity to share its story. I will be happy to share that work with the committee when we undertake it.

I turn briefly to a few other areas in my portfolio, and will crack on through those. We are tackling all forms of violence against women and girls through our equally safe strategy and the £39 million delivering equally safe fund, which supports 121 projects. Funding is at record levels, and we are committed to ensuring that funding arrangements are fit for purpose, so I have established an independent strategic review of funding.

One of the issues that the sector has faced for many years is the precariousness of its funding—some members of the committee will have had experience of that. An independent chair, Lesley Irving, is in place, and an advisory group has been appointed to carry out the review. The group will meet for the first time in May. I wanted there to be an independent review of the process, so that we would have a good critical friend to tell us what needs to be done.

Working closely with people with lived experience, we are updating our disability strategy. We have committed more than £5 million in funding to disabled people’s organisations, including the access to elected office fund, which is particularly pertinent given the local government elections in just a few weeks.

We are also listening to our older people. Last week, I had valuable discussions—they are always valuable—with our older people’s strategic action forum. We are investing more than £2.2 million of funding in supporting older people’s organisations and age equality projects.

We are delivering our immediate priorities plan to tackle racism and to address the unequal impacts of Covid-19 that were identified by the expert reference group on Covid-19 and ethnicity. That plan takes forward actions across Government, including in health, employment and education.

The Government is clear about the need to act to end conversion practices, as we discussed during the recent debate in the chamber. I congratulate the committee on that debate and on the work that you did for your report. It has been incredibly insightful and will help us to move forward.

I am pleased to tell the committee that our expert advisory group on that issue will meet on Thursday for the first time, and will complete its work by the summer. I will meet the group that day, to support and develop that work. I can give you an update on that as soon as we can.

A human rights bill will be introduced during the current parliamentary session; we will consult on that this year. Later this year, we will also consult on our first equality and human rights mainstreaming strategy. Again, those are works in progress, and I will be happy to update the committee as we go forward with them.

Our equality and human rights fund, which totals £21 million over the three years 2021 to 2024, supports 48 organisations to tackle inequality and to advance rights.

Finally, we continue to support our human rights defenders. This afternoon, I will meet two participants in the Scottish human rights defender fellowship programme, which is delivered by the University of Dundee in partnership with the Scottish Government, Amnesty International and Front Line Defenders. Those women demonstrate remarkable bravery and leadership in the face of daily threats to their safety. It will be a privilege to spend time with them.

I hope that that quick run-through of just a few things that cut across my work has been helpful to you, and I am happy to take any questions.

That question touches on two areas: the work that we do generally to advance human rights budgeting and then the work on the Scottish Government’s budget, the work of the Parliament’s Finance and Public Administration Committee and the equality budget statement.

We have a detailed equality budget statement on the recent processes and are currently investigating that to see where progress is being made and how we can maintain it.

You will know that one of the first decisions that I took when I became a minister was to appoint an independent chair to our equality budget advisory group, because we felt that it was important for that group to have the independence to be a critical friend when we needed it.

That work is on-going. It ties in with our review of the public sector equality duty, in which we are considering where we should place duties and responsibilities and how we should strengthen them.

A bit of work is being done to support all that. The Scottish Women’s Budget Group is developing awareness, running training and creating understanding about the contribution of gender budgeting in the process. We have just committed £220,000 to it to do that for us. That group is another independent source that will be a good critical friend and help us to determine where there are gaps. That is another piece of work that is going on and on which I am happy to update the committee later when some of its recommendations come through.

Yes, I am more than happy to do that.

You would have heard me saying in the debate that I did not think that the UK Government’s plans went far enough, although I was happy to work with it. We are continuing to build that relationship as we speak. Once we have met the expert advisory group on Thursday, we will know which areas it wants to advance and we will be able to focus on those.

At that point, I think that I will make another approach to the UK Government to ask for an update. We have moved on since the UK Government published the work that it was doing and the consultation that it undertook. We need to get things as fresh as possible.

As soon as the group has met on Thursday, I will go back to the UK Government to ask for an update on where we are and to try and release some of the tensions around reserved and devolved matters. We want the legislation to work for everyone, and we want it to work in as many jurisdictions as possible. That means that we must work very closely with our colleagues at Westminster, and I am happy to do that.