The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 620 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
As Colin Brown and John McKenzie will know, my area could be impacted by proposed changes to Cumbernauld fire station, although I should say for the record that it is not a full closure that is proposed. I also put on record that I am very grateful to the FBU for the interaction that I have had with it, particularly its local members.
My first question is about the process, which I would like to get your perspective on. Many advantages have been derived from the fact that we now have a national service. I have seen that locally in the tremendous response from firefighters across the entirety of central Scotland to wildfires and the St Mungo’s church fire, which you will be well aware of. Your mention of Cowcaddens is pertinent to my question. I have been struck by the fact that the proposals seem to have been made on a localised or regional basis. Cumbernauld is part of the proposals that were set out for Lanarkshire, but my area might be just as impacted by, for example, the closure of Cowcaddens or changes that have been posited for Springburn.
Are you also concerned about the process? We have a national service, but the manner in which the proposals have been laid out does not necessarily seem to have reflected that or to have taken advantage of the fact that we have a national service.
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
We could talk about the process of consultation and the concerns that we have about that, but maybe the issue is less about the process and more about the proposals that have been consulted on. Has enough consideration been given to how what happens in one area might impact on another? That is a concern for me.
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I have very specific questions for individual witnesses, convener, so I will be brief. The first question is for Agnes Tolmie. Your written evidence says that it is
“a significant oversight that the Bill does not require the collection of data on all protected characteristics as defined under the Equality Act 2010.”
You specifically cite
“sexual orientation, gender reassignment, religion or belief, pregnancy and maternity, and marriage or civil partnership”
as omissions. Your submission touches on this, but will you set out some of your concerns about those characteristics being omitted?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That is helpful.
I have one final—again, very quick—question, specifically for Debbie Jupp. In response to the question on
“concerns about the human rights or equality implications of the Bill”,
the written evidence from Committed to Ending Abuse says:
“The expansion of notifications and data processing engages privacy rights under Article 8 of ... ECHR.”
I must confess that I am not aware of that particular issue.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
We have also heard from other academics, and we had the experience of engaging with women who are involved in the selling of sex—a summary of that engagement has now been published.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
When you say shortfall, you mean the difference between—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
This is probably an imponderable point, but you can correct me if I am wrong. We will have the UK budget today, and I am wondering whether there has been any indication from the UK Government on this. I suspect that the answer is no, because this would probably have been trailed, and the UK Government is not going to change its position on employer national insurance contributions. However, perhaps more fundamentally, it may change its position on the amount that it will provide to the Scottish Government to cover public services—those in the justice portfolio in this instance.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
So, you have no concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
One part of the bill is on the nature of assistance and support for women who want to leave the selling of sex. You have said that there has been widespread support for that proposal, which I recognise, but there is not a lot of detail as to what that support would consist of. In your mind, what would it look like, how would it be provided, how would it be done on an even basis and what would the likely cost be? Moreover—and this is key, because we know that exiting from the sale of sex is not likely to be a linear process for everyone—should support also be available to those who are not immediately seeking to leave the sale of sex?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Those are obviously appalling figures.