The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 620 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Is there a concern that the bill could cut across that and divert activity away from what has been the purpose of the discussion thus far?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That means that significant progress will be made by the end of next year. Are you confident that we will be able to roll the system out across the country in due course?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I have a few questions on the back of the letter that the minister kindly sent to us yesterday. My first question relates to the Government’s assessment of the financial memorandum and the cost of the bill. You set out that there would be significant costs for local authorities, which have been estimated—I will not give the precise number—to be about £4.7 million under part 2 of the bill and about £4.8 million under part 4. The memorandum indicates that those costs are likely to be underestimates. What led you to that conclusion? Do you have a more realistic figure for the specific costs for local authorities, as well as for the cost of the bill as a whole?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Thank you.
I have one final question, which relates to education in schools. In its evidence, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service highlights the right given in the bill to withdraw pupils from domestic abuse education and suggests that there could be implications in respect of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. I found that an interesting observation. Can you say any more about it?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That sounds as though it could be an extensive process for Police Scotland.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Apologies. I have a heavy cold today. I have a few questions for the witnesses, predicated on some of the written evidence that you have provided, with some questions that are specific to specific witnesses. The first is for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and is on the area of data collection and reporting. In your helpful submission, you set out your concern that the provisions in the bill
“provide for a victim of domestic abuse potentially being asked for the same comprehensive personal data multiple times”.
Will you expand on that a little further and set out why that might be a concern?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I will stick with data collection and reporting for a question to Professor Gilchrist in relation to the Law Society’s written evidence, in which you set out concerns regarding the proposal. Perhaps you can respond more widely on what those concerns might be, but I notice that you say specifically that, as an organisation, you wonder
“whether it would be more useful to analyse data regarding the offence itself rather than the complainers’ characteristics.”
Will you say a bit more about that?
10:00Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That was helpful.
I know that you did not cite this issue, Professor Gilchrist, but I saw you nodding along to what Dr Forbes was saying. Do you have an observation on this area?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Is there potential for the cost to be quite significant?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Do you get the sense that not enough thought has been given to the issue of compliance with the UNCRC at this stage?