The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 620 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I appreciate that, but deterrence is part of it. That brings me on to my next question. The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Police Scotland said in their oral evidence that they had not seen any evidence that the provisions of part 1 of the bill would act as a deterrent. Do you have an evidence base to the contrary?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
No—they are saying that they have not seen an evidence base for what you are proposing.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Does that counter what Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service have said about the lack of an evidence base?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service are not the Government, are they?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
You told me that you could, if you were. You just said—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I fully accept that I am probing you on that, which is what we are here to do.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I have one final question for Ms Gosal. What would you say in response to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and the Law Society of Scotland if they flagged concerns about the UNCRC compatibility of other bills?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I will stick with part 1 of the bill. In our evidence session with the Scottish Women’s Convention and Scottish Women’s Aid, I was quite struck by—indeed, I was quite surprised by—the significant concerns that they raised about your bill. Scottish Women’s Aid felt that the provisions in part 1 would offer only a “minimal” amount of safety for victims or accountability for perpetrators, and that they would place a “heavy bureaucratic burden” on organisations. What is your response to Scottish Women’s Aid’s concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Surely we have to take it at face value that she was speaking on behalf of Scottish Women’s Aid. She was not here to speak on her own behalf, was she?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
If that is weighed against the concerns of Scottish Women’s Aid that it would provide a “minimal” amount of safety for victims or accountability for perpetrators, do you think that the bureaucratic burden is worth it?