The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 567 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I have a final and straightforward question that is based on the Victim Support Scotland response to the Prisons and Young Offenders Institutions (Scotland) Amendment Rules 2025. On the basis of what you have already said, cabinet secretary, I think that your answer will be a yes, but I would like to get that on record. VSS is seeking an assurance that any deputy governor with delegated powers would, when making a determination, have access to the same information that a governor would see.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
However, that is not on the table here—we are not considering that as part of the list of propositions.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I appreciate that. Ruth Breslin has pre-empted my question—
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Cabinet secretary, you have spoken about the impact of the current situation—you described a transactional relationship between staff and those who are being held in our prison estate.
I was struck by a pretty stark comment in the policy note on the impact of the current situation on
“SPS’ ability to provide a safe environment for those living and working in Scottish prisons.”
The note then goes on to talk about
“a decline in the acceptable working conditions for staff within prisons.”
Can you say a bit more about the impact of the current situation on staff safety and how the regulations might alleviate concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I support the regulations, and I think that the committee should support them because the circumstances that have been set out require us to act.
It is interesting that the deputy convener conceded at the outset that we are in an emergency situation, and an emergency situation compels us to respond urgently. I am afraid to say that the deputy convener’s response to the cabinet secretary did not indicate what would otherwise constitute an urgent and emergency response. It would be very easy to pass on by and abdicate any responsibility for trying to find a solution. With respect, I would say that that would be a knee-jerk response. It is clear that the regulations have not been proposed lightly. People will be watching.
It is important to remind ourselves that there are clear restrictions on the cohort of prisoners that will be eligible for early release—that is set out very clearly. Life prisoners will not be eligible. Untried prisoners will not be eligible. Terrorist prisoners will not be eligible. Those who are subject to proceedings under the Extradition Act 2003 will not be eligible. Those who are subject to notification requirements under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 will not be eligible. Those who are serving a sentence of imprisonment or detention for an offence that is aggravated as described in the Abusive Behaviour and Sexual Harm (Scotland) Act 2016 are not eligible. There are others—I could go on.
That is not to dismiss the reasons why those who will be eligible have been imprisoned. I recognise that the courts have made that assessment and determination, and I do not dismiss that lightly, but we must remind ourselves that there are prisoners who will not be eligible.
The governor’s veto will also be extended to deputy governors. They can make a further assessment, and those who might otherwise be eligible could be vetoed.
The most compelling reason that I have heard thus far is the impact on the prison environment and on being able to undertake the rehabilitation of prisoners, which I know is sometimes dismissed as not important. As far as I am concerned, it is an essential part of the work that is undertaken in prisons, because, if it is done properly, it creates a safer society. However, for no other reason than that we have heard that overcrowding has an impact on the safety of those who work in the prison environment, we should support the regulations today.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That is helpful. Ruth, you talked about that exact experience.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Thank you very much for your evidence thus far. I have a few questions—I flag that early. If you can assist me by not testing the patience of the convener in working through them, that would be—
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I am putting words in your mouth, so you can tell me if I am wrong, but the conclusion that you are drawing is that changing the law to criminalise the purchase of sex does not alter the dynamic.
12:45Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
What is the Irish experience, Ruth?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
It is maybe too early to conclude, but is the bigger challenge societal and attitudinal? Cultural change would reduce demand more than the law per se.