The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 567 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
What sort of support should there be?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I will focus my questions on the Police Authority’s corporate costs and corporate function. It is important that you are appropriately funded in your oversight role. Your submission makes it clear that the corporate function was allocated 0.4 per cent, or £5.5 million, of the policing budget in 2025-26. The submission said:
“When benchmarked against other similar policing oversight bodies, this reflects favourably.”
Can you evidence that? Which bodies are you comparing yourselves with? What is the equivalent amount of funding that they receive?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That is fair. I recognise that that might not be a question that could have been answered. I also understand that we do not want to stray too much into individual cases. However, if you were able to provide more information on the context, that would be useful.
I am not suggesting that you will have this information to hand, but it would also be useful and instructive to have a historical comparison. Clearly, you are referring to the basis on which the system has operated for the past five years, if not longer, but it would be useful to find out what the experience was over a longer period of time. I presume that there would have been far more prosecutions, but it would be useful to have the evidence to back that up.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Do others have a perspective on that?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
If we could get that information, that would be really helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Forgive me, but can we come back to that later? I am actually asking whether the evidence suggests that there has not been an increase in violent incidents.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Professor Phoenix, do you have anything to add?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I have a question about policing, so could we come back to that later? I am thinking more about the increase in violent incidents and the adoption of more unsafe practices. Could you say more about those? We can come back to the issue of policing.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Therefore, staff safety is central to the thinking behind those decisions.
I have a couple of other quick questions. Victim Support Scotland has responded to both of the instruments that we are considering. On the victim notification scheme, Victim Support Scotland expresses a view that the rate of subscription to that scheme is still quite low. It would be useful to know what is being done to promote the scheme and to ensure that victims are aware of it. Victims cannot be compelled to take part, but they should be aware of their right to be part of it.