The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 567 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
This might be a difficult question to answer, but in circumstances in which section 46 of the 1982 act did not exist, is it likely that there would have been enough grounds for those prosecutions still to have proceeded?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That is useful to understand.
Your submission has been helpful, and I thank you for sending it to us. You have also touched on this point in some of your responses thus far, chief constable. One section of your submission discusses “emerging issues”, and I want to go through a few of those that you have set out. I appreciate that you might not have an answer as to the specific costs, so you might have to come back to us on that.
You noted the
“anti-immigration protests focusing on hotels”.
I do not know whether there is a way of working out what the costs of that to Police Scotland have been.
You also mention having to police
“the proscription by the UK Government of ‘Palestine Action Group’.”
Again, I do not know whether you have a figure for the cost of that to Police Scotland.
There was also operation roll 2 for the visit of President Trump. You mention
“the significant demand placed upon policing in Scotland”,
which we would all understand would be the result of such a visit. What was the cost of that?
11:30Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
It would be useful to have the costs broken down for each of those areas.
I think that you have answered the question. In effect, you just have to deal with those issues within the budgetary envelope. It is not as though you can forecast or plan for that. What is the operating assumption at the start of any financial year for that type of activity?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That would be useful in helping our understanding.
There are two ways of looking at the issue. Given the basis on which cases are operating at the moment, the obvious question might be: what would be the purpose of repealing section 46 of the 1982 act? Maybe that gets to the heart of Sharon Dowey’s question about whether it is still useful to have that provision as part of what we might call the armoury that is available for use in investigations. Alternatively, if it is not being used, why should we keep it on the statute book? What is your perspective on that?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Do you dismiss the notion that such a change could increase the risk of violence against those involved in selling sex? That is the fundamental question—would it increase that likelihood?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Again, that is useful to understand. Your submission goes on to say:
“we remain committed to driving further efficiencies in our own activities.”
Can you set out at this stage what that might mean? Is there a quantifiable figure at the moment, or will it emerge down the line?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That, too, is helpful to understand. The committee would be interested in hearing what further steps are taken in that regard as that emerges.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
The comparison is with the other UK authorities.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
It might be worth us looking into that a lot further.
What is the cost to the Police Authority of the increased national insurance contributions? I asked Police Scotland a similar question.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Certainly. This will be my final one. Only Police Scotland responded to the point about whether there should be a statutory right for people involved in selling sex to access support services. Everyone on the panel is entitled to answer, of course, but I put my question to Detective Superintendent Bertram in particular. What should such support look like?
We heard evidence that experience of such changes in Sweden did not result in an improved relationship between those selling sex and the police there, but that the Irish experience was different and the change has improved that interaction. How would the situation here link to those experiences?