The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2857 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one last, logical question. We have talked about the fact that this is an essential system that will deliver benefits. What indicators will the Scottish Government use to measure whether value for money has been achieved?
10:45Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
There is wide variation in the effectiveness of sponsorship throughout the public bodies; the problem is how to get consistency. The Scottish Government is trying to do that. Is that down to individuals at the end of the day? Is it down to how effective the people at the front line are?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, I am going to look at a couple of points. One goes back to value for money, but in this case it relates to the Oracle cloud system. Your report states that the Oracle cloud system was implemented at a total cost of £59.5 million, which is a wee bit higher than the initial estimate of £22 million, and that is without taking into account an additional cost for the enterprise performance management reporting modules, the cost of which is currently estimated to be about £1.8 million. That seems to be a very substantial overrun. In your report, you state that
“appropriate governance arrangements were in place”,
but it does not seem to me that the governance could have been all that good if the cost estimate was that far off the mark.
Over the years, it has been our experience that many Government projects have offshoots, if you like, in smaller organisations, where the implementation of such things goes skew-whiff. My understanding was that the Scottish Government had put in place a process for supporting smaller units within the Government that would not be expected to have the resources to do such things in-house. What happened? Why did it go so far adrift?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
I do not think that anybody is challenging the need for the system; it is really a question of the implementation. You also say:
“The Scottish Government anticipate that they expect Oracle Cloud to be in a stable state in Autumn 2025.”
Do we know whether that has happened? Is it now in a stable state?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
At what point was a red flag raised because the project was going off track?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
So, at this point, we do not know what the end cost will be.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
My concern is that we had other projects that encountered various difficulties before this project came forward and, in response, the Scottish Government put in place support and a process that should have eliminated those problems with this one, but that did not happen. I am trying to get to the bottom of why it did not happen.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
You touched on the finance system for NHS Scotland, which is another fairly complex system that is coming down the road. Have we learned the lessons so that the same thing will not happen with that project?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
I am not sure that the importance of sponsorship is adequately understood throughout the system. How could Parliament and the public be better informed about how effective sponsorship arrangements are, particularly when the outcomes are not very good or when risks are escalating in that unit?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Colin Beattie
We can look ahead to enterprise performance management. You talk about £1.8 million for that. Is there a process in place to manage that more closely and realistically, so that we do not end up with exponential costs again?