The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Again, when it comes to the board, I would like some reassurance that proper scrutiny and challenge are in place, because—hopefully—we have learned through all the deficiencies that have been thrown up both in the audit and in the corporate governance review. What sort of reassurance can we have that those deficiencies have been rectified?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Colin Beattie
My understanding, based on evidence that we have taken in other meetings, is that each NHS board has unique characteristics because of the way in which it has developed, and that there is a need for each board to provide some familiarisation for directors coming in. That is normal: it is not unique to the NHS. Non-executive directors are appointed to the boards of many different types of private and public organisation.
Let me move on.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Good morning, Auditor General.
Nothing happens without money. The whole programme hangs on whether public and private investment can be obtained in very large quantities. The fourth recommendation in the report is that the Scottish Government should
“clarify how it will use public money in the short and long term to support the delivery of its Heat in Buildings Strategy objectives, while achieving value for money”.
When would you expect the Scottish Government to be able to do that? What evidence would you expect to see in order to demonstrate that value for money is being achieved?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 February 2024
Colin Beattie
To me, there are two ways that the private sector can get involved. One is by directly financing discrete projects; the other is by providing finance to householders to carry out whatever works are needed in their homes. Has consideration been given to the balance between those? It seems problematic that the facility to go into debt to do that work will be particularly attractive to households. Has any analysis or work been done on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Which is correct?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
That seems to be a simpler approach. What you are describing is organisations going down into the weeds and coming up with other different definitions and so on, which are very difficult to measure against.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Lindsey Millen, do you want to add anything to that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
I will direct this question to David Livey, but I am sure that it is applicable to the others, too. You have highlighted that the majority of your members who have bid for public contracts have a negative or a neutral opinion of the process. There seem to be no very positive opinions of it. Will you expand on that a little bit and detail the issues that your members encounter? How can the accessibility of the system be improved?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
Are you saying that all contracts are for a year? Surely not.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Colin Beattie
I do not think that anybody argues that three or five-year contracts would be much more desirable than an annual contract. The difficultly always comes back to the problem of Scottish Government funding, which it gets annually, and it is difficult for the public sector to commit beyond that annual funding. It is a common and acknowledged issue.
You talked about the physical system being quite complex to access. Is that across the board, or are there examples of better practice that could perhaps be held up?