The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Is there any support for smaller suppliers on making best use of the framework once they are on it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Do you know how many companies have not received any work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Alison, you could perhaps answer the question that I am about to ask, which is related to that point. What work are you doing to improve reporting on major capital projects and infrastructure investment plan progress, including providing the information in tabular form, for example, which would make it easier to track over a period?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
To what extent were emissions reduction and equality considerations taken into account when the IIP was being developed, and how will you weave them into the consideration of the next IIP?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
The Auditor General’s briefing paper says that
“it is difficult to get a complete picture ... of how”
the Scottish Government
“is directing funding to”
its infrastructure
“priorities.”
That seems to be because there is limited supporting documentation on how projects are prioritised. I do not know whether “limited supporting documentation” is some kind of code for poor-quality record keeping, but there is no indication of how those projects contribute to wider policy outcomes, such as gender equality, climate change and so forth. Do you agree with that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Do you agree with the Auditor General’s briefing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Okay.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Another comment from the Auditor General was that it was
“difficult to track the progress and spending of individual”
IIP
“projects and programmes.”
Do you agree with that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
I have one final question for clarification. Alyson Stafford, you said that the Scottish Government had accepted all the recommendations in the briefing, but you have also indicated that there are parts of it that you do not accept. You have indicated one of them. Are there other areas in the briefing that you have reservations about?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Colin Beattie
We appreciate that, but we take what the Auditor General says literally, and we assume that he has access to any information, documents and so on that are available. If he says that it is difficult to get a complete picture of how the Government is directing funding to infrastructure priorities, we tend to take that at face value. I hear what you say but does it mean that the Auditor General did not get full access to all the information that he needed, and that that led him to his conclusion?