The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
I had assumed that the one hour was for exercise or whatever.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
I am trying to keep this simple. Board members have champion roles in their areas of expertise. They are also responsible for giving direction to senior officers and for challenging whatever it is that they challenge. Is that multiplicity of roles not kind of confusing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
As soon as you see the complexity of governance, you get a bit worried, because the committee has come up against a history of poor governance again and again. Obviously, we do not want it to happen in relation to NSET.
The Scottish Government has not established a shared budget for NSET. Do you know why? Will you expand on some of the risks in that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
I would like to explore double-cell occupancy and its consequences.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
In March 2023, 31.5 per cent of prisoners occupied double cells across the prison estate. In the Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee’s 2020 report, in session 5, entitled “The 2018/19 audit of the Scottish Prison Service”, that committee described the solution of addressing capacity issues by doubling up prisoners as
“a step backwards rather than forwards.”
In response to that report by our predecessor committee, the Scottish Government said that the doubling-up of prisoners in cells was not its “preferred approach”. It further stated that the SPS was
“actively working to provide single cell accommodation”
to all prisoners.
Do you know whether there has been a significant increase in the use of double cells? Has the SPS improved the situation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
The previous reports that we have looked at have said that 31.5 per cent of prisoners were in double cells. Is the figure still about the same?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
It is simply the sheer volume of prisoners that is driving that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Is there an alternative?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
Particular reference has been made in the past to Barlinnie, as well as to the wider prison estate, of course. However, the difficulty there is that, in the words of the chief inspector of prisons, a restricted regime is in place to keep prisoners “safe and controlled”. Just a few minutes ago, you talked about prisoners being in their cells for 23 hours a day. How is that possible? In prisons in rather more brutal regimes, prisoners are in their cells for 23 hours a day, but we are doing the same here.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Colin Beattie
There are lots of groups in place to support the delivery of NSET, but there seems to be a strong possibility of duplication of effort, fragmentation and lack of clarity of purpose. Were those risks part of your work? Did they inform the briefing? Did you observe them to be the case in practice?