The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Colin Beattie
That is a headline. How is the strategy actually being implemented?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Colin Beattie
What is the timescale for that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Colin Beattie
You are relatively confident. Are you satisfied as to the good faith in that regard?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Beattie
However, the fact that the agencies have had a budget decrease will restrict their activities. By all means, they should prioritise, but I would have hoped that they would have prioritised exactly what they were doing, even before the decrease. That is bound to have some impact on the different areas that they are working in. How do they deal with that? It is all right to say that they should prioritise, but how do they do that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Beattie
Thank you for clarifying that. In the budget for 2024-25, the enterprise agencies and the Scottish National Investment Bank got quite challenging budget settlements on the back of the pressure on the Scottish Government’s budget, which has been reduced. What impact will that have on the services that they provide? Will they have to prioritise which of their activities will be scaled back and which they will focus on?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Beattie
To come back to my fixation on financial transactions, how certain are we that financial transactions will go away in the future—in other words, that they are finished?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Beattie
I mentioned SNIB a few minutes ago. I am interested in looking at its funding, much of which came in the form of financial transactions. Currently, the Scottish Government does not anticipate receiving any further financial transactions from the UK Government. Do you expect that more will be available in the future? If not, how do you intend to meet the pledge to capitalise the bank with £2 billion over 10 years?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Beattie
Do you have an example of Scottish Government support going through SNIB?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Beattie
My concern is about where the funding will come from as financial transactions vanish. Budgets are extremely tight and I cannot imagine that they will be any easier next year. How do we keep the momentum going with SNIB? How do we keep the bank’s good work properly funded so that it can deliver?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Colin Beattie
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I would like to pick up on a point that you raised earlier during the discussion on income tax, which is one of the few tax-raising levers that the Scottish Government has under its control. I want a point to be clarified. I presume that much of the focus on income tax would go away if we had control over, for example, national insurance, corporate tax and VAT. There would be more levers to consider and income tax would be less of a focus, because there would be a broad spectrum of taxes that could be manipulated. Would that be correct?