The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2931 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Do you have any information on when that review will be completed? Will you consider the outcome of it in your next audit?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I will move on to look at data breaches. Paragraph 16 states:
“Historic Environment Scotland has reported eight personal data breaches between March and November 2025 to the Information Commissioner’s Office.”
That is quite a lot of breaches within a fairly tight period. Is there any connection regarding why they all took place?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I guess we do not have any information on when we might hear about that from the Scottish Government.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
We have heard a previous discussion about the merits of steel versus concrete. We have also been advised that sites across Europe use concrete quite successfully and without problems, but it is beyond our technical expertise to decide on that argument. I do not, however, see why there should be a problem with using concrete here when it is used successfully elsewhere.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
On the same line of questioning, if the funicular were to fail, what would be the outcome with the least cost and least risk for the public sector at that point?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
We touched on the economic effects. I have a couple of quick questions on that—I am conscious of the time. Your submission says that doorstep research suggests that the funicular has a limited impact on local businesses. How robust is that evidence and how should it be compared to HIE’s modelling?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Is it true to say that there is some responsibility for monitoring on the part of UHI?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I would like to look at one or two aspects of governance. Some of them have been touched on already but there are points that I want to be sure of, for my own clarification.
This is probably a question for Vicki Nairn and Mike Baxter. My understanding is that all communications on financial matters, budgets and so on are funnelled through UHI. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I have one or two questions about the financial support for NHS boards, particularly in relation to the proposed change of support. Paragraph 31 of your report says that
“brokerage had increased sharply in recent years, that it was unsustainable, and that it created an inequity with those boards who were operating within their statutory duty to break even.”
The report mentions three sources of funding that the Scottish Government has replaced brokerage with: sustainability funding; deficit support funding; and financial support funding. It also states that there is a
“lack of clarity and transparency around the introduction”
of those deficit support funding mechanisms. Will you elaborate on why you reached that conclusion?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
You said that you did not become aware of the lack of a budget for Perth immediately. You first of all received notification from somewhere—probably from Perth, but I do not know—saying that there had been audit delays.