The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2569 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
If you are recruiting internally, having a pipeline of skilled people coming up the line is absolutely essential. The previous committee commented that there was a relatively small number of people in that pipeline and that, among that small number of people, there was an even smaller number of people who were interested in taking on chief executive posts. Has that situation changed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, for quite a lot of years now, we have had concerns about the quality of leadership across the public sector, with, of course, specific concerns quite often arising about the national health service.
I note that your report lays out some issues with regard to recruitment. That is not a new thing; indeed, as far back as 2019, our predecessor committee called on the Scottish Government to take urgent action to address the leadership challenges across the public sector.
There are a number of issues in that respect. The previous committee looked at the apparent insufficiency of people putting themselves forward for, say, chief executive posts and so on, and at a round-table meeting that was held, there was a feeling was that there was a problem with the environment that some of these people were expected to be promoted into as chief executives and that that was a deterrent in itself. I do not know whether that was a valid statement; it simply came up at the round-table session.
Has that situation improved? Are there more people coming up who have the skills and ability—and, indeed, the willingness—to take on chief executive posts?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Given that this is a bit of an anomaly, what is the situation like in the rest of the UK? Are the issues similar? Is turnover of senior staff similar?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
You mentioned stability, which is tremendously important. Given the number of movements that we are seeing, is it not inevitable that some instability will feed into the system, given that so many people have taken up their posts over such a short time? Surely it will be difficult to provide continuity.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Colin Beattie
You mentioned all the changes that the NHS needs to drive through. Are you satisfied that internal recruitment will achieve that? Although there are benefits to internal recruitment, we want there to be competition so that we get the best people into post. Are we losing out from the point of view of cross-pollination in getting the skills that we need?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
If the subsidiary was audited separately, would Audit Scotland have sight of the audit reports? Would you scrutinise them in the interests of looking at the health of the group?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
From what you have said, the college has not really given an adequate reason why, given the knowledge that it had, it did not do anything.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Were they, in fact, signing off in the full knowledge that no contract was in place?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
The report says that the
“review of the procurement in relation to the Fuel Change project ... identified spend of £677,597 (excluding VAT) across three suppliers that were appointed without a procurement process being followed, and resulting in breaches of the Financial Memorandum.”
Will you explain what the financial memorandum is, its role in governing college spending and how it interacts with procurement and governance frameworks?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Colin Beattie
Does the SFC manage that? How far does it monitor such activities?