The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
I will cover a couple of other things on the MBA side. On 31 July 2024, the director general net zero confirmed that he is
“not aware of any other public bodies in Scotland that require senior staff to hold MBAs”.
What is so different in WICS that senior staff are required to hold MBAs?
I am still curious about the meaning of the word “analyst”. I do not know whether that is a high-level post or a lower level one.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
Knowing what is in an MBA, it is hard to see how an MBA is particularly appropriate as a medium to upskill people who are working as analysts in WICS.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
To put to bed the issue of the MBA programmes, have you completed your human resources review of policies and procedures, which you said would include a full review of staff training and the policy of funding MBA programmes? Has that been completed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
Yes, but you are not actually answering the question. Is there, or was there, a requirement that senior members of staff—I am not sure what the definition of “senior” is—hold an MBA? That is the Scottish Government’s understanding, so is that correct or not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
I also want to know whether employment offers included access to an MBA qualification as part of the contract. That is a whole grey area; we need to understand what the policies were and how they were executed, as well as how the communication between the Scottish Government and WICS operated. Was the Scottish Government fully informed of how you were operating in that respect? Those are all key questions.
I will return to WICS. The opportunity to obtain an MBA was supposedly essential for staff retention. Why was it considered to be appropriate to spend nearly £120,000 of public money to do that? I am talking about the specific case that has been quoted.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
I would like to ask about staff training, in particular the MBA situation. In WICS’s FOI response of 10 July this year, there was a copy of an approval form for a member of staff to attend the executive MBA programme at the London Business School on 8 May 2018, at a total cost of £119,300. The form states:
“To support the further development of [redacted] the employment offer included the opportunity to obtain sponsorship for the completion of an MBA Executive Programme.”
That is important. It is in relation to the employment offer.
In its letter of 10 June to the director general net zero, the Scottish Government says:
“the Scottish Government was aware from 2006 ... that WICS had a policy of funding MBAs for senior staff. In 2014 the Scottish Government approved a WICS Pay and Grading Restructure ... which included ... a fully funded MBA, available after 4 years’ service”.
In 2017, again, through a revised grading structure, the Scottish Government referred to
“senior members of staff being required to hold an MBA”.
Is the MBA part of the contract of employment? Were certain—or all—members of staff offered an MBA? If so, on what terms?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
It seems to contradict the Scottish Government’s understanding, so I will ask the Scottish Government—perhaps Michelle Quinn—what its understanding was. Did it understand that that was part of the contract of employment? Did it believe that there was a requirement for senior members of staff to have an MBA?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
I come back to the question of the MBA. The approval form reads as though that member of staff accessed the course as a result of their contract of employment. I have been asking whether all contracts of employment for senior staff or staff above a certain grade offer that—that is not clear to me.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
The name is redacted, so I do not have that information, but it is the case in which the person went to the London Business School on 8 May 2018. It was included in your FOI response of 10 July.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Colin Beattie
The form implies that they were. If you could come back with confirmation of that, that would be good, because I might have a question after you come back to us.