The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
Only 22 out of 352 farms are currently authorised to discharge emamectin benzoate, which is regulated under the higher environmental standard that was recommended by UKTAG in 2022.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
Why did the Scottish Government opt for a four-year implementation period, despite there being evidence that the chemical was having poor effects on the environment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
Is it logical that, following a risk-based analysis, only three out of 352 farms would need an unannounced visit?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
I am sorry to keep at this, but is that level of monitoring consistent with recommendation 62 of the REC Committee report, which called for
“a significantly enhanced regulatory and monitoring regime under which it will robustly and effectively enforce compliance with environmental standards”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
Cabinet secretary, I want to ask specifically about the use of chemicals and medicines. I am sure that anybody, if asked, would say that there is a need to minimise the use of both of those.
I was interested to see a response from Professor Nick Owens about the effect of treatment using emamectin benzoate and hydrogen peroxide. He told the committee that there was a “pretty reasonable idea” that there was an adverse impact on crustacean species.
How robust is the data on adverse effects on the different species of the use of chemicals and medicines?
09:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
What is the timescale for that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
Is giving the industry time to adjust itself the only thing that is holding up progress towards the new standard?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
How will you measure the progress, both in terms of the number of farms that fall under the tighter standards and in terms of the impact of their transition?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Colin Beattie
Obviously, enforcement of the regulations is important. SEPA informed the committee that it had carried out three unannounced inspections in 2023 and that it planned to carry out a further three in 2024. That seems to be a wee bit feeble in terms of enforcement. Do you think that that level of monitoring is consistent with ensuring that the regulations are implemented?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2024
Colin Beattie
You touched on the UK budget. There are still many uncertainties over how that will work when it comes to how much we will get at the end of the day—or how much will be taken away after it has been given to us. Is there any indication that it will alleviate some of the pressures, or will it simply be absorbed by pay rises that will not contribute to public services?