The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3032 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
What we are referring to here is the national picture as opposed to the ground-level approach. However, we do not know what those local institutions are doing around reaching out to care-experienced young people. Do we assume that it is happening, or do we have evidence that it is happening?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one last question. Given the Auditor General’s comment that the Scottish Government lacks a clear framework to assess the overall impact of ADP, how might the recommendations of your review support the development of such an evaluation strategy?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on to another area that you will not be unfamiliar with: data collection. I do not know how many times this committee has talked about the lack of data and the anomalies within the data collection system.
Page 4 of the report says:
“Available data is not sufficient to assess if services are improving the lives of care-experienced people at a national level, but improvements are under way to enable long-standing data barriers to be addressed.”
The first question is, what are the data barriers that are being addressed? Given the fact that data collection has been in front of the committee for ever and has always been commented on, why is the Government not learning from previous deficiencies?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
I sometimes despair of the terminology that is used in some of these reports. On page 27, you refer to “longitudinal research and data triage”. Could I have that in English, perhaps?
10:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
That is very good to hear. The problem is that aspects of dignity, fairness and respect are very subjective and are difficult to measure. You get responses to your questionnaires and so on, and you do your assessments, but how do you evaluate that information in a way that helps Social Security Scotland to put in place positive changes in response?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Colin Beattie
The Auditor General highlighted that survey scores are positive overall, which seems to align with your consultation findings, but Audit Scotland also noted that it is not clear what levels the Scottish Government would regard as acceptable or whether it expects better satisfaction scores for PIP, given that the approach to ADP is different. Audit Scotland suggested that Social Security Scotland should consider setting such a level as part of its evaluation and include results around dignity, fairness and respect in the public performance indicators to measure success in that regard. Do you agree with that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I am keen to understand the relationship between the work of the local council and the body that is providing the funding, or a great part of the funding, which is the Government. There seems to be an element of isolation.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I would like to talk a little bit about funding for the major flood schemes. The Auditor General’s report indicates that
“the funding mechanism for major flood schemes is not fit for purpose”.
That is quite a strong statement. The report also says that the funding mechanisms lack the appropriate safeguards to manage risks relating to delays and cost increases. That is worrying, given the nature of what we are facing. What mechanisms will be put in place to ensure that future risks of delays and cost increases are better managed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Some of Mr Boyd’s comments lead on to my final question. There has been some suggestion that the criteria for assessing major flood schemes might favour more affluent areas. That might be because the criteria look at capital values or whatever; I do not know what the criteria are, but that is the suggestion that has been made. Which criteria might be used to appraise investment in future flood schemes in terms of value for money, but also taking into account inequalities and wider benefits? Perhaps Mr Boyd might like to comment on that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
How do you engage with councils on existing projects such as the Musselburgh flood protection system, which is in my constituency? A number of schemes that I have looked at, including that one, started at one size and gradually grew legs and became much bigger. As far as I can see, those changes are developed locally, and it seems that there is no Government co-operation, oversight or input into that.