Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 2 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2922 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Colin Beattie

That seems to be a bit of a recipe for confusion and a lack of activity. The concern is this: who took the decision—and if the decision was taken, who took the responsibility—to allow this to slow down or, indeed, stop? If it did happen, who is responsible for getting it moving again?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Colin Beattie

The point that I am trying to make is that someone somewhere is responsible. It cannot just be some diffuse responsibility that magically comes together.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Colin Beattie

It still sounds a bit hit and miss to me.

Do you agree that the recommendation to review was regarded as a signal either to stop, or at least to slow down, what people were doing?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Colin Beattie

At the evidence session on 10 December, Fraser McKinlay explained to the committee that those responsible for delivering the Promise might have taken the recommendation to review things as a signal to stop what they were doing, which, in turn, might have allowed

“some inertia”

to

“creep into the system, and … derail progress.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee,10 December 2025; c 15.]

Would you not say that it is the responsibility of those tasked with leading the delivery of the work to ensure that that does not happen, instead of the onus being on the Auditor General to adapt his recommendations?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Colin Beattie

I was asking for your opinion, rather than what is in the report. Do you believe that the review was taken as a signal to slow everything down or, indeed, stop?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Colin Beattie

It is clear that you have a concern about the worthy political ambitions being able to achieve what everyone is looking at. There is a question about how the ambitions are delivered. Do you believe that there is a problem with how the Promise is being delivered?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 14 January 2026

Colin Beattie

Auditor General, I would like to chew over procurement again. Paragraph 15 of your report states that

“there are weaknesses in the current risk, governance and control procedures that could affect the delivery of objectives”

and that there were weaknesses, particularly in procurement, relating to the inappropriate use of single-source justification. Internal audit raised that issue as part of your report. Did it raise it with the board, and if so, when?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 14 January 2026

Colin Beattie

Can you comment on whether there is any correlation between the absence of the accountable officer and the introduction of those practices? Do they predate that absence, or is it something that grew over a period?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 14 January 2026

Colin Beattie

In relation to procurement, you have mentioned one or two of the weaknesses that were found. Were any others identified?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 14 January 2026

Colin Beattie

Just to be clear, the weaknesses that are mentioned in the annual audit report are those that prompted an internal audit review of procurement. Is that correct?