The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2922 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
That seems to be a bit of a recipe for confusion and a lack of activity. The concern is this: who took the decision—and if the decision was taken, who took the responsibility—to allow this to slow down or, indeed, stop? If it did happen, who is responsible for getting it moving again?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
The point that I am trying to make is that someone somewhere is responsible. It cannot just be some diffuse responsibility that magically comes together.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
It still sounds a bit hit and miss to me.
Do you agree that the recommendation to review was regarded as a signal either to stop, or at least to slow down, what people were doing?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
At the evidence session on 10 December, Fraser McKinlay explained to the committee that those responsible for delivering the Promise might have taken the recommendation to review things as a signal to stop what they were doing, which, in turn, might have allowed
“some inertia”
to
“creep into the system, and … derail progress.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee,10 December 2025; c 15.]
Would you not say that it is the responsibility of those tasked with leading the delivery of the work to ensure that that does not happen, instead of the onus being on the Auditor General to adapt his recommendations?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I was asking for your opinion, rather than what is in the report. Do you believe that the review was taken as a signal to slow everything down or, indeed, stop?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
It is clear that you have a concern about the worthy political ambitions being able to achieve what everyone is looking at. There is a question about how the ambitions are delivered. Do you believe that there is a problem with how the Promise is being delivered?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, I would like to chew over procurement again. Paragraph 15 of your report states that
“there are weaknesses in the current risk, governance and control procedures that could affect the delivery of objectives”
and that there were weaknesses, particularly in procurement, relating to the inappropriate use of single-source justification. Internal audit raised that issue as part of your report. Did it raise it with the board, and if so, when?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Can you comment on whether there is any correlation between the absence of the accountable officer and the introduction of those practices? Do they predate that absence, or is it something that grew over a period?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
In relation to procurement, you have mentioned one or two of the weaknesses that were found. Were any others identified?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Just to be clear, the weaknesses that are mentioned in the annual audit report are those that prompted an internal audit review of procurement. Is that correct?