The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3034 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
What are the implications of the ESF programme ending in 2023? If the Scottish Government has not been able to clean it up and reclaim any funds, does it simply become a dead loss? If so, are there other financial implications behind that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
I am still struggling a bit with the positivity around this. You had a bit of extra time, which gave you a chance to spend more time enhancing and improving delivery of the census. I presume that that had a cost in itself, and that it is rolled up into the £14.4 million.
You still have not answered the question about what the goods are that are so significantly increased in price that they warrant a mention.
09:45Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
You are telling me that the original specifications for delivery of the census were underbudgeted, because you are saying that you found out that some things would take longer and added it into the cost subsequently. It appears to me that your original costing was not accurate.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
You were talking about the coding of pieces of paper.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
You mentioned it specifically and said that the exercise that you did showed that it would take longer than you anticipated. That must indicate that you would have had a budget overrun had the census gone ahead as originally planned.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
The impression that I got from Paul Lowe was that the £21.6 million is mitigated by the benefits that you have been able to achieve in additional experience and being able to look more closely at the programme and enhance it and so on, but that still does not actually mitigate the £21.6 million. It is still costing £14.4 million more than it would have had the census gone through.
It says specifically in the report that it is due to the cost of extending suppliers’ contracts. I do not know whether you negotiated with the suppliers to change their contracts, but that would obviously create an additional cost element. It is also mentioned that part of the additional cost is the increase in the cost of goods. What are those goods that are so significant?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Okay. You said that supplier costs increased, which was a substantial portion of the cost increase of the programme. What actions did you take to mitigate those costs?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Earlier in 2021-22, you identified additional financial pressures of £1.5 million in the census. You have reduced that to £0.5 million through implementation of mitigating actions. What are those mitigating actions?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Obviously, one of the main costs is people. What you are doing to manage the workforce costs, particularly your numbers of temporary staff? What are you doing to make sure that you keep a tight hold on that?