The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2424 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
It seems to me that indicators are there to inform and guide us on future investment and future focus on where we put resources. If the current indicators do not do that, is there a case for saying that however comparable they might be, and however accurate they might be, we need different indicators in order to extract more detailed or cogent information that will allow us to take decisions? Is that possible?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
What discussions have you had with the Scottish Government on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Colin Beattie
I have one last question on this subject. We have highlighted in questioning that there is disparity in the indicators in respect of the prominence of exam performance versus the wider outcomes. In your report, you make it clear that the Scottish Government and local authorities should be working together to ensure that more prominence is given to the balance. Is there any indication that is happening?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Skills shortages are not a new thing. Back in the sunlit days before Covid and Brexit, a number of sectors were under pressure—IT perhaps being one of the most obvious. If we compare the skills shortages then with those that we have at the moment, have new sectors come under pressure because of skills shortages? If so, is it possible to identify whether the cause is Brexit or Covid? That question is for Chris Brodie.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Would it be correct to say that Brexit and Covid have accelerated some of the changes, so that the skill shortages that we are seeing now would have come anyway, but maybe further down the line or more gently?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Colin Beattie
I invite Nora Senior to comment.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Before I invite Lisa Pattoni to respond, I will make one comment that builds on what Fiona Hyslop said. Is it likely that the lack of home-grown skills in Scotland will impact on investment in the economy in general? Obviously, people rely on Scotland being a highly skilled nation, but it does not sound as if we are at the high end, in this area.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Are we behind other countries in Europe or the rest of the UK on that? Is the problem specific to Scotland, or is it a common issue that everybody is struggling with?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Colin Beattie
I was going to ask about common agricultural policy funding. That continues into next year, 2022, does it not? I presume that you will continue with your current auditing role up to that point, by which stage there will be, I assume, some clarity about how things are going to work.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2021
Colin Beattie
Many members of the committee are new and are not familiar with the history or the past discussions that have taken place. Nevertheless, I am sure that it would be productive for that discussion to take place with a view to picking up from where the previous committee was at and, hopefully, agreeing to offer you support with that. The previous committee was willing to approach the Scottish Government with a view to making it compulsory for bodies to be part of the initiative, but it was not clear what the Scottish Government would have to do to bring that into effect. Would legislation be needed or just guidance? How strong would it have to be?