The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2443 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Over a period, we have seen a lot of failures in sponsorship. To be fair, the committee sees only the failures and not the successes, so we have no real feel for what they look like. However, does the fact that there have been so many failures over the years not mean that the whole sponsorship system is failing to deliver what it should deliver? Maybe there should be another look at how it all works and how that support is given.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, WICS is a very small organisation—tiny, in fact—but for quite a number of years, it has adopted a culture in which the irregular is almost the norm. Buried within that is what I see as a level of extravagance not matched elsewhere in the Government sector. I know that action has been taken to put in place new limits on that, and new ways of controlling and managing expenditure through financial controls—all of those things—but underneath all that is still a culture that has been allowed to flourish, and which has been embedded for a great many years.
In reading your report, I detect—and this is my interpretation—an element of caution as to whether, in fact, that profound cultural change throughout the organisation as it is presently structured can actually be achieved. Am I reading too much into that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Other than an audit qualification, what does the refusal to grant retrospective approval actually mean? What does it do? What is the impact?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Good. I will leave that just now, but I have one final question about the financial settlement for the former chief executive. As you said, Auditor General, the total cost to the public purse was £105,488. You stated in your report that
“The Commission should have taken more time to consider the wider options”.
Did WICS provide any explanation about why it did not take longer to consider the options? The option that it chose to push through quickly virtually indemnified the chief executive against any repercussions from what was happening, because there was a settlement agreement that covers both parties. He was virtually given a get-out-of-jail-free card. What explanation was given for why WICS narrowed the matter down so quickly, almost within days?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
I will ask you a couple of quick questions. We have talked about the changes that are taking place in WICS. In paragraph 84 on page 35 of the annual audit report, you talk about what has been done to address financial management weaknesses in particular. How long do you anticipate that it will take for financial management and a focus on value for money to be embedded across the organisation to the extent that they become business as usual?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. I will stay on the financial side. Paragraph 8 on page 6 of the section 22 report talks about the three items of expenditure that did not meet the requirements of the SPFM. Paragraph 70 on page 32 of the annual audit report says that WICS sought retrospective approval from the Scottish Government’s sponsor division. It did not receive that retrospective approval.
Given the concerns that arose during the committee’s scrutiny of the 2022-23 audit report regarding the Scottish Government’s previous retrospective approval of expenditure, are you content that WICS’s subsequent request for retrospective approval has been handled appropriately by the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Some of my colleagues also want to come in on this issue, so I will hand back to you, convener.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
We have been talking about retrospective approval, but I want to go back to the question that I asked on sponsorship. I asked for an assurance that the current sponsorship arrangements with WICS are working well. I am not sure that I got a direct answer to that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 December 2024
Colin Beattie
I will carry on from where the convener left off. I am looking at the “Alcohol Framework 2018” and the obstacles that have been encountered in delivering the commitments in the framework. I would appreciate it if my question was addressed across the three principal areas that are laid out in the framework, which are to reduce consumption; to support positive attitudes and choices; and to support families and communities. What have the obstacles been? Have there been achievements that we do not know about?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 December 2024
Colin Beattie
You talked about the ageing nature of those who are dependent on drugs and how many have been in their situation for 10 to 20 years. Is there evidence that consumption of alcohol among younger people is dropping? Are crude consumption levels an adequate indicator of the harm that is being done? Is the situation similar, with a fall-off in consumption among younger people, but those who have been dependent on alcohol for many years still coming through the system and getting older? Does alcohol consumption track drug taking?