The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2424 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
Okay. Perhaps the Auditor General can provide the committee with clarification when he can.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
It would be good to see the figure. I realise that the period was one of extreme urgency and that the PPE had to be acquired to protect lives.
Your briefing also says that the 48 PPE hubs were to be in place
“until the end of June 2021”,
and that the Scottish Government and NHS NSS were “considering future arrangements”. Do you have any idea what those future arrangements might be?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
Other than the fact that the Government is still evaluating its forward plans, was there a specific reason why it decided to continue to support private providers?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
Paragraph 87 of the section 22 report says:
“NHS NSS has committed to ensuring retrospective contract approval and monitoring this through its established governance group.”
How is that progressing, particularly in respect of the contracts that are described and the issues raised about them?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Colin Beattie
Community Justice Scotland has highlighted some areas, as has the Auditor General. There seems to be a problem that must be addressed. Community Justice Scotland has the powers. I am not asking for it to be draconian, but if going behind the scenes, having a wee chat to people and trying to usher them down a particular path is not working—and it demonstrably seems not to be working—action needs be taken.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Colin Beattie
In that case, you also accept that there is an issue around accountability and lines of responsibility. It is therefore a question of what you will do to change what is happening now in order to ensure that those required outcomes are achieved.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Colin Beattie
I will ask more questions about that in a second. Page 5 of our Scottish Parliament information centre briefing shows the proportion of the population that has received the vaccine. Pretty much all the way down the line there is a discrepancy between those who got dose 1 and those who got dose 2. It is a not insignificant discrepancy, overall. Why is that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Colin Beattie
Ah. It is a private paper. It shows that, by local authority area, there is a discrepancy of a few percentage points between take-up of dose 1 and take-up of dose 2. Did you encounter that during your audit? Did you note that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Colin Beattie
Has that impact assessment been published yet?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Colin Beattie
I detect a certain amount of uncertainty in your responses over whether everybody understands their roles and responsibilities. Perhaps one of the issues is that the community justice partners still remain accountable through their usual accountability arrangements. Does that create an issue?