The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2424 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Colin Beattie
We move on to agenda item 3. Our main item of business this morning is our first evidence session in our inquiry into Scotland’s supply chain, which is the committee’s first inquiry.
We decided that we wanted to consider the short-term and medium-term structural challenges that face Scotland’s supply chains. We are interested in how the challenges and shifts in supply chains are impacting Scotland’s economy. We want to look at how to build future resilience and at whether there are opportunities to develop domestic supply chains. We are structuring the inquiry around the three themes of people, places and product. Today’s session will focus on the first of those themes—people—and look at the demand for skills.
I thank our panel for joining us today. I welcome Katy Heidenreich, who is supply chain and operations director at Oil & Gas UK; Paul Hunter, who is a lecturer in human resource management and organisational behaviour and specialist professional at the University of Glasgow’s Adam Smith business school; Mark Logan, who is a start-up and scale-up adviser to the Scottish Government; and Melanie Simms, who is professor of work and employment at the University of Glasgow’s Adam Smith business school.
There is no need to touch any buttons, such as the “speak” button. That will all be done for you.
We will move straight to questions and I will ask the first question. How significant are the skills and labour shortages that are affecting Scotland’s economy? Are there sectors or regions that are facing particularly acute challenges? I ask Katy Heidenreich to comment first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Colin Beattie
Thank you. I ask Mark Logan to comment.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Colin Beattie
I think that Mark Logan wants to come back in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2021
Colin Beattie
I think that Katy Heidenreich wants to come back in.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
How many of the commission’s staff, particularly at senior level, were seconded from the Scottish Government? To what extent did that secondment of employees lead to a blurring of the lines in the relationship between the commission’s management team and the sponsorship function?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
You have to open the book first to see what those are.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
After seeing so many failures, I certainly encourage you to consider looking at the whole rather than the individual parts.
I will carry on with one or two more questions. The report raised concerns about the leadership of the former convener of the Crofting Commission and, clearly, that person did not really recognise the distinction between their role and that of management. Do you think that the role of the convener has now been set out clearly enough? Is it understood by the current convener?
09:45Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
The report states that the former convener “retained the confidence” of the board in spite of all the issues around his leadership, such as “failing to appropriately chair” board meetings and arranging private decision-making meetings. That raises a question that was briefly touched on earlier: were those board members offered, and did they attend, the training that is usually made available for board members? That would have equipped them to challenge some of the actions that were taken by the convener.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
It would have been the responsibility of the convener to ensure that training took place, of course.
I want to ask about sponsorship. A bit of clarification might be needed here, Auditor General. The report states that the Scottish Government’s sponsorship division
“appeared to view its relationship of consequence as being with the Senior Management Team rather than the Convener.”
Earlier, you said that the sponsorship division’s relationship was with the CEO, which is slightly different. Perhaps you could clarify that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2021
Colin Beattie
Could we have clarification as to whether it is in fact a secondment or simply a matter of terms and conditions?