The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2443 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Can I interrupt you there and ask how many people are on the board?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
The construction of the vessels is an operational issue. The human resources committee is not involved in the building of the vessels; the company has it own structure for what that involves, and we can all get our heads around what that would be. The audit committee is not operationally committed either; it deals with the internal circumstances of the company, as in any other business. I am struggling to see the additional operational pressure on the HR and audit committees because of the construction of vessels.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. Let us move on. We have talked about risk management and governance arrangements. The thing that stands out in the audit report is where you state that there were
“significant delays to the commencement and completion of reviews that were agreed within the 2023/2024 internal audit plan.”
In paragraph 19 on page 9 of the report, you say that
“internal audit was unable to complete enough reviews to provide an opinion on the overall risk management, control and governance arrangements”.
That is pretty sweeping. Could I get a bit more information on that, to get a better understanding of where the issues arose? Was it a capacity issue in FMPG, an issue with the auditors, or a combination of both? How did that come about?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
You said that internal audit could not do sufficient reviews to give a proper audit opinion. Can you boil that down to a percentage? Did you get half or a quarter of the reviews done, or is it that, across the board, the reviews were not really completed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one final question on the matter. I can understand that for an organisation that had not, in its existing culture, had an internal audit function, there would be difficulties in adjusting to and taking part in that.
Are you satisfied that sufficient progress is being made in order that the 2025-26 internal audit function will deliver what is required?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Colin Beattie
So far, you have not described a plethora of committees. They are the sort of committees that you would expect to see: the human resources committee, the audit committee and so on. Why is that putting so much pressure on the board?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Beattie
I am the MSP for Midlothian North and Musselburgh.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2025
Colin Beattie
We put a lot of focus on planting for the future and the difference between non-native and native woodland planting. However, in recent times, some people have said to me that we need to think further ahead than that. Some woodlands, whether they are native or non-native, will not survive climate change, so, for the long term, we will have to plan for different species. The question is, which species do we plan for and how do we go about that? I have not seen great focus on that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
My understanding is that there has been quite a bit of controversy about settlement agreements over a period. I understood that settlement agreements had to be signed off at a very senior level, yet the evidence that I have seen is that Scottish Government ministers were unaware that the settlement agreement had been concluded. If I recall correctly, ministers wrote to WICS to that effect.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Colin Beattie
I am pleased that you brought up sponsorship. As you know, we have a fairly patchy history on the quality of sponsorship. The Scottish Government carried out a review of the whole sponsorship system, which threw up a lot of issues. I hope that the Government is still addressing those, because they are certainly long-term issues.
In the case of WICS, there is no doubt that sponsorship failed—it just did not do its job. Your follow-up section 22 report is a wee bit light on the sponsorship side. I would like reassurance that the sponsorship process that is in place now is effective and doing its job.