The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2443 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Did you find any indication that NHS Highland is using staff vacancies—at consultant level, in particular—to manage its savings? In other words, has it been delaying appointments?
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Colin Beattie
If Westminster decides not to produce an assisted-areas map, how will we determine the areas where that level of aid should be directed?
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Colin Beattie
I would like to look at the implications that HIE highlighted around the lack of a definite commitment to an assisted-areas map. I ask the witnesses what the importance is of having an assisted-areas map and how it should be developed, and what the implications are of not having one. I ask Steve Fothergill, who I know has a close interest in the issue, to respond first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Colin Beattie
David Bell wants to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Do you agree with the point about the Highlands being given the same status as London? I do not know whether I misinterpreted what was said, but it seems that, in the levelling-up process, the Highlands were put on the same level as London. I see Steve Fothergill shaking his head. Maybe he can clarify.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Colin Beattie
You have questioned the criteria that could be used to determine an assisted-areas map. Surely we have templates that were in use previously; we have the EU template.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Colin Beattie
I just want to clarify something in my own mind. I have this vision of a big pot of liabilities taken from all four nations sitting down at the Treasury in Westminster. How is that accounted for?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Colin Beattie
Thank you. I call Mark Ruskell.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Colin Beattie
Some of that might come up in my next question—you can come in after that.
Auditor General, I want to continue with a question about those resources: £1.5 million of the funding that was approved as contingency in 2021-22 was used to recruit additional permanent positions. Was last year’s request for management contingency effectively a request for additional staff and therefore additional recurring budget? I am concerned not to mix up recurring and non-recurring contingencies.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Colin Beattie
Thank you, Auditor General.
I will ask the first question. Back in January 2021, the Scottish Commission for Public Audit approved your budget proposal for 2021-22, which included a request for an increase in contingency to £2.4 million, to implement
“a long-term sustainable resource programme”
to meet the needs and demands of public audit. I will not go through it line by line to talk about what has been allocated to what, but you said then:
“If we identify any potential underspend against this budget allocation, we will indicate this at the earliest opportunity for a return to the Scottish Consolidated Fund.”
You gave that undertaking. The latest management contingency update letter appears to suggest that £107,000 of non-recurring surplus has been used to secure “time limited external support”.
In relation to the £500,000 management contingency that is sought for 2022-23, will you expand on the types of unplanned financial risk for which it could be used? Will any underspend be returned to the Scottish consolidated fund? Basically, why have you not returned the surplus money from last year? Will you give the same undertaking this year?