The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2443 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
From memory, in past circumstances where there have been similar suspensions, it has turned out to be the delivery agency that has failed to comply, and the Scottish Government has been left to sort that out. Is that the case again?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
What are the implications of the ESF programme ending in 2023? If the Scottish Government has not been able to clean it up and reclaim any funds, does it simply become a dead loss? If so, are there other financial implications behind that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
You have emphasised that you are not raising a red flag but, in a way, you have, by mentioning in the report that this matter is an issue for the board. Can you confirm that the capacity of the board is not a risk factor at this time?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Okay. I will move on to another question. In paragraph 21, on page 7, your report tells us:
“The board has recognised that elements of costs included within the financial plan may potentiality become part of core services in the future, but the longer-term funding position is ... unclear.”
Can you provide some detail as to why the longer-term funding position is unclear?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Okay. If you could come back to us with that information, it would be good.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
The board reduced from 11 to seven. Five of the current board members were there in 2018-19, so there has been no change to the skills base. All that has happened is that two people—with “relevant financial experience,” it says in the report—have been brought in. How does that balance the skills across the piece with those of the other five members?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
That is good.
The normal term of office for a non-executive board member is four years, but the length of appointments can be varied for continuity purposes. When is the recruitment process for new members likely to commence?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, your report explains that NHS Highland’s budget uplift of £16.4 million is its share of the £30.2 million that is being provided nationally to maintain NHS boards within 0.8 per cent of national resource allocation formula parity. A simple calculation suggests that NHS Highland receives more than half of the funding that is available nationally. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 13 January 2022
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, as a result of the 2018-19 report, the number of non-executive board members was reduced from 11 to seven. The 2020-21 section 22 report states that
“Consideration of the capacity of Board members is an ongoing issue for the Bòrd, given the workload associated with the position.”
Can you clarify what the workload involves? Does it derive from the fact that the number of non-executive board members was substantially reduced?