The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Colin Beattie
What you have described is a UK-wide issue, and, in that respect, we in Scotland might benefit by having more accurate data. When it comes to improving information, there are two levels to take into account: the overall UK improvement, and the potential Scotland-level improvement—that is, what the Scottish Government might or might not be prepared to invest in to get better data. If the Scottish Government were to suddenly win the lottery and were able to spend some money on improving the data, what would be the most productive area for that spend?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Colin Beattie
Jonathan, you were talking about the need to upgrade and modernise your systems. To be blunt, I would point out that the last time that you tried to do that, it did not work so well—I cannot remember how many billions you wrote off on that one. What are the prospects of getting the money that you need to drive those changes, which will clearly be beneficial not just for Scotland but for the whole of the UK?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Colin Beattie
From what you are saying, a lot more is going on than the committee was aware of. We go by what the NAO says, and it is unequivocal about the low level of investment in such evaluations. Why does the information from the NAO seem to be pointing in one direction, when you are saying that a lot of other stuff is going on? Does the NAO not have access to that information?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Colin Beattie
I have one final question, which is about the impact of tax divergence. The Comptroller and Auditor General said:
“One of our big critiques of Government generally, including HMRC, is the surprisingly low level of investment in evaluation of the impact of different policies.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 19 February 2025; c 10.]
Does the Scottish Government have enough information about the impact of its tax policies to be able to make informed choices in the future?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Colin Beattie
What you have said actually emphasises my concerns. The NAO report shows so many estimates, projections and UK-wide calculations, including for the south-east of England—which, of course, distorts any figures for any other place—and we are relying on those figures to calculate the Scottish rate of income tax. Looking at the NAO report, you would say, “My gosh, so many areas here are actually quite weak.” However, when I speak to HMRC or to you, you give reassurance that things are not, in fact, quite as drastic as they would appear in the NAO report. Would you agree with that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Colin Beattie
If it were to be possible to get that information, that would be really helpful.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Beattie
Just to be clear on this, do you believe that councils are projecting forward from existing trends to judge what will happen in the future, instead of having actual data that they can tap into to validate such projections?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Beattie
As you suggest, the Scottish Government’s position seems to be that the tribunal is a last resort, but there is no requirement for parents to explore mediation before resorting to that route. What can the Scottish Government do to address that? In your view, would a mandatory mediation process prior to tribunal access help to alleviate some of the pressure?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Beattie
Paragraph 26 of your briefing highlights that the recorded growth is
“unlikely to be capturing all additional support needs.”
Can you give any detail on what steps are being taken to ensure that the pupils who require ASL are being identified and supported?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Colin Beattie
I want to come back to some of the figures in your briefing, particularly those that are set out in paragraph 22 and exhibit 3. Paragraph 22 says that
“The number of pupils recorded as receiving ASL has increased by 768 per cent since 2004”—
that is, from 4.5 per cent of all pupils to 40 per cent, which is a fairly dramatic increase. I am aware of a high school in my constituency where the figure is 54 per cent. Local councils are saying that those numbers will continue to rise, but what is that view based on?