The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2922 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Yes, please.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
How robust do you think those plans are?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Okay. That is good.
Moving on to paragraph 68, I wonder whether you can tell us a bit more about the variances in the approach to discharge planning across the integration authorities. In particular, how are those facing challenges such as
“workforce shortages, limited resources and varying levels of co-operation”—
which we have heard in the past is a major issue—
“and joint working”
addressing those?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
In talking about IJBs in the past, we have noted issues around the transfer of funds into the primary function. How successful has that been? Has it improved? Is more money now coming into that area, or is it still being held tightly by the NHS?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
It is simply that, in paragraph 88, you quote the ALLIANCE, which highlights negative attitudes towards the third sector. Have you looked into that at all?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
That sounds like quite an important area if the third sector is such a vital component in addressing the problem and if there are relationship issues and negative attitudes such as are highlighted in the report. I can understand that organisational differences, process differences and so on could come into it but, as we all know, attitudes can colour relationships and have a negative effect.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
And you think that that is what happened.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I will move on. In your letter to the Auditor General, you commented:
“You have observed the ‘implementation gap’ between ‘political ambition and how things are actually delivered.’“
It is the Auditor General’s role to identify those gaps and draw them to the attention of the committee. Scrutinising the issues is an important part of our work. Are you saying that the Auditor General’s assessment of delivery against the Promise is inaccurate?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I hear what you are saying, but that is a little different from observing an implementation gap between political ambition and how things are being delivered. You are looking at how things are being delivered. What about the gap between the political ambition and the delivery?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Okay—I will leave it at that.