The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2831 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Okay, that is fair enough.
I will turn to the money, which is always far more interesting. There were comments in the report of 9 December 2020 by the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee that highlighted the fact that some milestone payments or stage payments were somehow out of order. The clear finding was that they were being constructed in such a way that qualification for payments was not necessarily in the order that it should have been, and so on. We have also heard that that is normal for the industry. Is it normal for the industry?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
I am a layman. I have no idea how to build a ship, but in any contract, milestones exist to say that a certain sequence of events has taken place leading to a critical point at which payment is triggered. The Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee found that that was not the case and heard evidence that that was not the case. Why is that practice okay in the industry? I am trying to understand that. To have one isolated event that will result in a payment then another isolated event that will result in a payment, although the bits in between have not been done, seems odd to me. I do not understand.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Okay. You paid FMEL £83.25 million. That is about 85 per cent of the contract value.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
At the time of nationalisation, there was every indication that the vessels were far from ready to be launched. Did you have any questions about the amount of public funds that had been paid in, the lack of progress on these vessels and the fact that they were far behind where they should have been? Surely the milestones and the robust checks that took place should have thrown up quite clearly that some of these works were not happening.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
At this point, we are not touching the loans that came from the Scottish Government. My understanding is that you were not part of that particular discussion.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
A great number of objections have been lodged—over 2,700, you said. There has obviously been a large campaign orchestrated by one of the political parties, and I understand that the cycling organisations have geared up. I also understand that the vast majority of the objections are outside my constituency and the immediate area of Sheriffhall. Have most of the objections been satisfied?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
I have one final point.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Do we have evidence of Derek Mackay’s approval? I presume that he must have signed off on something to authorise the change in the terms.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Did anything come from Transport Scotland?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 30 June 2022
Colin Beattie
What checks did CMAL make prior to making the milestone payments? Were the payments simply made against invoices?