The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
PwC must have given a written opinion. Is it possible to see that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
Is that in line with other bids? Would there be the same approach?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
It was not something different.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
When was that, approximately?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
Therefore, at that point, there was every reason to believe that FMEL was going to—
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
When I get the chance, I will ask questions of CMAL, but Transport Scotland had a responsibility in this, as well.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
Before I do so, I would like to get a small clarification from the witnesses. In connection with the builders refund guarantee, paragraph 21 of the Auditor General’s report says:
“During the negotiations, and contrary to what was included in its bid”.
As I understand it, it was mandatory that a builder’s refund guarantee be provided as part of the bid but, subsequently, FMEL came back and said that it could not provide that. The implication in the Auditor General’s report is that, in the original bid, FMEL had accepted that the BRG was mandatory, but that, subsequently, FMEL said that it could not fulfil that part of the bid. Elsewhere in the report, there is reference to the fact that, when FMEL completed its bid, it was silent on the subject of the BRG, so there was an assumption that FMEL had accepted that. Can you clarify that? Did FMEL actually accept the BRG or was it assumed, because FMEL did not challenge it, that it was accepted?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
Were you not the sponsor?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
Just to clarify in my mind, I recognise that CMAL granted the contract, signed it off, managed it and so on, but what reporting to Transport Scotland did it undertake on the progress of the contract and the issues that arose in it?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Colin Beattie
However, we ended up with a failed supplier.
I will take a slightly different angle on the money. A good chunk of the money was paid out. FMEL got most of the value of the vessels paid to it, actually. However, it also got loan support. As I understand it, that was not visible to CMAL because of commercial issues around it.
What was the rationale for that decision? Who made the decision to give those loans and, basically, provide working capital? What were the loan conditions and were they adhered to?