The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
In that case, I thank the witnesses very much for attending the meeting.
We will have a short suspension.
12:53 Meeting suspended.Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
That is not entirely clear in the accounts.
Can any of the additional costs be recovered from the organisation that is being audited, and is it expected that that figure—the 25 per cent, less whatever—will be written off against the Scottish Government’s budget support?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Last year, the commission was interested in understanding what Covid funds you received, how you deployed them and how effective it was. That is what it came down to.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Thank you for your opening remarks. I will start with a couple of straightforward questions. The last time we discussed the budget for Audit Scotland, we talked about the impacts of Covid-19 and the fact that those did not seem to be particularly well identified in the books. Of course, Audit Scotland itself highlights that with some of the organisations that it audits. We were promised that we would see a breakdown of Covid-19 figures. Unless I am mistaken and it is there in this pile of documents, I have not seen that sort of analysis. Is that available?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Thank you.
Your information technology costs include an increase in licences. Do you not bulk buy licences? Do you have to buy them individually for additional staff?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
I have, as you might expect, one or two final questions.
First, you have highlighted that remote audit is 25 per cent more expensive. To what extent can you recover any of that money from those being audited, and to what extent is it being written off against the additional budget resources that the Government has allocated to you?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
To what extent did you look at the 25 per cent additional costs of Audit Scotland’s remote audits and the impact of that?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
I welcome David Jeffcoat, who is a partner at Alexander Sloan.
There are just a couple of formal questions to ask. For completeness and for the Official Report, will you confirm that Alexander Sloan has received all the necessary information and explanations that it requires in order to form its opinion on the financial statements?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
Absolutely.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Colin Beattie
None of those additional costs go against the additional budget that was granted by the Scottish Government. Is that correct? I see the witnesses nodding—good.
I have a couple of other things to ask. Some of the expenditure, such as on staff recruitment costs, is a bit higher. We have talked about staff recruitment. When I look at Audit Scotland, there are several factors that might cause concern if it was another organisation. First, you have lost most of your senior staff. Secondly, your staff turnover is substantial and, thirdly, a substantial number of additional trainees have been taken on. Is there anything there that should cause us concern?