The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
I will probably cover a little bit of ground that others have covered but from a different angle. In your submission of 24 June 2022, you state:
“I do not think there was ever any suggestion of CMAL requesting a written Ministerial authority”.
Would it have been you who would have advised CMAL if a written ministerial authority was required?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
So, as far as you are concerned, the decision on the contract award was down to CMAL—at the end of the day, it was CMAL’s decision.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
In your personal case, did you have any communication directly with Mr McColl during the procurement process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
It is well known that there were disputes between CMAL and FMEL, which seem to have been fairly extreme. What discussions did you have with other ministers, and what actions did you explore, to try to resolve the dispute and bring the companies together? Mediation did not go anywhere.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Mr McColl said that you had advised him privately that the CMAL board would resign if you interfered in its proceedings. Do you recall that conversation?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
You said that you found some governance arrangements to be a barrier to resolving the dispute. Can you give us a little more information on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Yes. One of the key points here is that the decision was taken to nationalise the company but full due diligence does not seem to have been carried out, as would normally be the case. Will you comment on the reason for that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
My memory is that the accountable officer—I cannot remember his name—said that only partial due diligence could be carried out. I think that it was said that that was partly due to time and the availability of information.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Given that the decision was taken without a full understanding of the costs and challenges in the company, and in the light of subsequent issues and given its history, do you still think that it was the right thing to do?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Did they do so?