Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Criathragan Hide all filters
Displaying 2597 contributions
|
Public Audit Committee
“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2022”
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Ah.
Public Audit Committee
“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2022”
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Colin Beattie
How confident are you about those new controls? The fact is that it was a human error. An instruction was given and checked and then released to the contractor, who acted on it. Why would that not happen again? What will those who are responsible do—will they have triple checks or quadruple checks?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Pre-Budget Scrutiny 2023-24
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Carolyn, do you have a view?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Pre-Budget Scrutiny 2023-24
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Coming in at the tail end, I have had the opportunity to listen to your very comprehensive replies. I must thank you for them: you have covered a lot of ground.
I would like to ask you a couple of daft laddie questions. Since I can remember, we have been talking about support for women, helping them in the workplace and so on. It seems that over the years that has not been as successful as we might have hoped. Why is that? We are all talking about it, so why has not more happened? Is it because of lack of money? Is it lack of something else? We seem to talk about it all the time, but we do not actually make the progress that people would like. Maybe Ruth Boyle could first give us her thoughts on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Pre-Budget Scrutiny 2023-24
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Given that we are talking about budgets and that everything, at the end of the day, comes back to money, has the money that has been put up for gender equality been well spent?
Public Audit Committee
“Scotland’s colleges 2022”
Meeting date: 22 September 2022
Colin Beattie
It is a bit alarming that the SFC’s funding has gone up during the period that we are looking at, from 75 per cent in 2017-18 to 79 per cent now. That was never intended. It was intended that colleges should generate some of their own income—and they do, but not at the level that was anticipated prior to Covid.
Public Audit Committee
“Scotland’s colleges 2022”
Meeting date: 22 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Let us look again at exhibit 1, which shows that the SFC is forecasting the adjusted operating position of colleges. It shows a deficit of £5.6 million in 2021-22 and a projected deficit in 2022-23; the figure then moves into surplus in 2023-24. That seems positive, but how realistic is it? Is that achievable?
Public Audit Committee
“Scotland’s colleges 2022”
Meeting date: 22 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Back in 2014, when ALFs were formed—we were probably optimistic in those days—the theory was that commercial income would be parked in them and drawn down against specific contracts as time went on. There does not seem to be much evidence that that has been a terribly successful strategy. It seems to me—but please confirm this or otherwise—that ALFs are a dying breed and that, as the funding that they received in 2014 dies, there will be no support for the colleges.
Public Audit Committee
“Scotland’s colleges 2022”
Meeting date: 22 September 2022
Colin Beattie
Why is it that two thirds of the money in ALFs relate to the three Glasgow colleges? Is that just historical or is there something behind it? Why are they more successful?
Public Audit Committee
“Scotland’s colleges 2022”
Meeting date: 22 September 2022
Colin Beattie
I have a final area to cover. Staff costs are shown as 71 per cent of the total expenditure in 2020-21. That is high, but it is, of course, very much a staff-driven environment. People have to be able to present courses and so on. Therefore, although 71 per cent is high compared with the figures in other sectors, it is possibly justified. However, that means that there is very limited manoeuvrability to save money elsewhere. Staff numbers fell by 1.2 per cent in 2020-21. How sustainable are those staff numbers, given the financial pressures that colleges face? Colleges really have only staff numbers to play with to save money.
