Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 15 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2953 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

To be clear, have you asked for support from the Scottish Government’s public bodies unit?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

Is there going to be more this year?

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

Good morning. It is clear that the role of Transport Scotland was seriously called into question in the report. I will mention a couple of things. The project steering group that Transport Scotland led was seen to be weak and ineffectual, and Transport Scotland officials failed to communicate some quite important information to the Scottish ministers on CMAL’s behalf. In the Scottish Government’s response, no reference is made to those concerns. Are you able to take the opportunity now to respond to those concerns about Transport Scotland?

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

During the process, Transport Scotland had a member on the CMAL board or attending the board meetings. How did the reporting line work, from that individual back to Transport Scotland, and then feed back to the Scottish Government?

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

Do you agree that the project steering group, which was led by Transport Scotland, was, in fact, ineffectual?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

That is good news.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

Was Transport Scotland’s role in providing the sponsor team support successful?

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

It is encouraging to see that improvements are being made and that lessons have been learned, but we are looking at the historical situation and the role of, for example, Transport Scotland as the sponsor in this particular instance. Do you think that it was successful in that role?

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

Surely, in the sponsorship role, you would be picking up on the issues around CMAL and, where necessary, feeding that back to ministers.

Public Audit Committee

“New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 21 September 2023

Colin Beattie

Thanks for that clarification, which leads me neatly to issues around record keeping. The committee concluded at paragraph 47 of the report that record and note keeping of meetings throughout the vessels project involving Scottish ministers was

“weak and fell well short of the standards of transparency and accountability we would expect.”

The Government’s response noted that

“further guidance has been issued and all parties ... continue to make improvements in record keeping”

and so on.

Can you provide any detail of what those “improvements in record keeping” have involved since our report was published?