The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Colin Beattie
Paul Johnston, you are an obvious person to bring in now, but can you comment on my original statement, which was about the fact that most of the levers sit with Westminster? How do we link in with Westminster’s child poverty policies? I have not seen them, but I presume that they exist. How can the Scottish Government link in with those to create an effective response? That also goes back to the question of how better preventative action can be taken in dealing with the current situation of children in poverty.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Colin Beattie
The Scottish Government is clearly doing everything that it can to support businesses, but how much capability is in its hands to make a truly significant impact on costs? Are we a big player in that regard, or are things out of our hands?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Colin Beattie
Good morning. There are a number of areas that I would like to explore a little bit, but I want to begin by saying that many of the issues around supply chains and everything that goes with them seem to come back to the incredibly poorly managed hard Brexit that we have been forced to go through. The knock-on effect of that seems to resonate all the way through our papers.
Specific skills gaps have been highlighted to the committee in this inquiry and, indeed, in other inquiries that we have carried out. One such area is digital skills. I note that, in your response, you say that a report on the Scottish technology ecosystem review is due to be published in the autumn. Can you provide any update on that work?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Colin Beattie
I will move on to a slightly different issue. How is the cost crisis hitting Scotland’s supply chain? How challenging for industry are the energy and material price increases? Are there particular sectors that are especially exposed to that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Colin Beattie
Given that this is a crisis for all our businesses, are any meaningful talks going on between the UK Government and the other three nations, especially Scotland, to try to manage the situation, reach a common result and make improvements?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Colin Beattie
Given the complexity of the digital requirements in the market, it must be quite difficult to provide a one-size-fits-all solution. We see in different segments of the market different needs and priorities, and there are different speeds of development. For example, I will just throw in e-commerce and the speed with which that is moving. How can we keep up with that to ensure that the skills that are being taught and passed on by our institutions and agencies are right up to date and at the correct level?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Colin Beattie
First Minister, I would like to start with a couple of questions about money. I refer you to pages 35 and 36 of the Auditor General’s report, and specifically to paragraph 72. This is in relation to the £45 million that the Scottish Government loaned to FMEL. There were some problems with CBC carrying out its side of the bargain. It paid only part of the investment that it said that it would make into FMEL, and there was some disagreement with the Scottish Government over the structure of loans. Can you give more background on that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Colin Beattie
It is paragraph 72.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Colin Beattie
I am looking at the Auditor General’s report, and specifically at paragraphs 81 to 83. The sequence of events that led to FMEL entering administration in August 2019 seems almost like a progression of that dispute, to the extent that
“the Scottish Government concluded ... there was no legal basis for CMAL to pay more than the fixed price for the contract.”
That seems to imply that that was the trigger for FMEL entering administration. When the Scottish Government took that decision, was there any thought that that might result in FMEL going into administration?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Colin Beattie
Continuing on the question of good faith, most probably, I am looking at the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee’s report of 9 December 2020, which makes it very clear that, in connection with the staged payments that had been made,
“there is strong evidence that the contractor deliberately proceeded to construct specific sections of the vessel either out of sequence or not according to the proper specification purely as a means of triggering milestone payments on the contract.”
That is a strong statement. The Auditor General has also highlighted those payments.
Subsequently, as I understand it, CMAL took legal advice, which was that it had to make the payments. Was there any discussion between ministers, you and the Cabinet about that issue?