Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2597 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Colin Beattie

I do not have a question on the particular issues that the minister has raised. However, in the previous parliamentary session, the Economy, Energy and Fair Work Committee looked at debt arrangement schemes and produced a report.

One of the key things that came out of the report was the question of independent advice before someone enters into one of those arrangements. The current arrangement does not allow for that; the financial advisers are all in-house to various interested parties.

The question of independent advice came up against a bit of a brick wall in relation to who would pay the cost. However, the committee found that many people were going into debt arrangement schemes that were possibly inappropriate and did not work for them. Will the Government therefore look at that again to see whether there is a solution to that issue?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

You referred to Glasgow as an area that had a lower response rate. Are there other areas of significance where similar patterns emerged?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

It improves the quality of the return, not the quantity.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

I have a quick question for clarification. In paragraph 15, you indicate that 42 per cent of overall staff costs relate to temporary staff. The explanation that is given for that is that those staff are needed for the census, which must be a major part, and for specialist IT projects. I am interested in what the split is between the two.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

For a place such as Glasgow, do we have any information about whether the return rate for particular ethnic groups was lower than for others? It is quite important that we get that outreach.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

You are saying that the data exists; it is just that it is not available to you at the moment.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

Thank you.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

Okay, that is good to know.

In your report, you state that, in order to

“improve the response rate, NRS field force staff offered support and assistance across Scotland”,

and that, in particular, they

“focused support in areas with lower response rates”.

Which areas had lower response rates and what additional support, as referred to, was actually given in those areas? Was it just more of the same, or was there something extra?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

Auditor General, I would like to go back to something that you started to talk about in, I think, your conversation with the convener. The rest of the UK—England, Wales and so on—had access to other databases, which enabled them effectively to boost the census return levels. Do you have any idea what percentage improvement was achieved because of that?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2021/22 audit of National Records of Scotland”

Meeting date: 15 December 2022

Colin Beattie

Your report also states that NRS is investigating, or continuing to investigate, the reasons for the lower-than-expected response rate and why it was lower in comparison with rates in other countries. How is it doing that, what progress is it making, and is there a target date?