The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2569 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I am looking at a chart from one of my local councils, to which I will refer when talking about definitions, rather than the actual figures, interesting though they are. I am looking at a whole spectrum of categories that the council uses in data collection. Given the breadth of all those, is it possible to train a teacher to be able to cover all those points? They include: dyslexia, English as an additional language, family issues, hearing impairment, interrupted learning, learning disabilities and mental health problems. That is a lot for a school to deal with.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I suppose that it is worth recognising that it is not just a small minority of ASL pupils who can be disruptive. Those who do not receive ASL can sometimes be a bit disruptive, too.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
There are other things that can affect the funding, such as whether the need is long term or short term. All those need different resources.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
You might have all the information at local authority level, but does the Scottish Government not have a role here, too, given that it is allocating the funding at the end of the day, and it needs to know that that funding is going to the right place? How can the Scottish Government be absolutely sure that the funding is going to the right place, and in the right quantity, if we do not have disaggregated figures?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Is there any assurance that the needs of those pupils who receive ASL are actually being met? The Scottish Government has a policy of inclusivity, which is quite right, but how do we evaluate whether the ASL pupils’ needs are being met and that we have the best possible outcomes?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
I look forward to seeing the report.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
I think that the document is good and quite strong overall, and it picks up on a lot of areas that the committee will be interested in. I will ask about one or two of those.
When the committee has discussed integration authorities with you in the past, we have always been concerned about the funding for them in respect of staffing and the commitment behind that, and we have heard anecdotal evidence that points to a possible unwillingness on the part of the NHS to pay its share into the IJBs. Can you tell us a bit more about the work that you are planning to do on the financing and performance of the IJBs?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
As Graham Simpson has mentioned, I have an interest in my own area in the Musselburgh flood protection scheme—I do not know whether you have looked at that at all. It was a relatively small scheme that is now, depending on how many options are taken, costing well over £100 million, and Government finance appears to be uncertain, or at best indicative.
The scheme has taken about three years to get to where it is, mainly as a result of objections that were raised locally. The whole process has been quite byzantine in its complexity when it comes to things progressing through the system—and, indeed, has been quite controversial, in that interested third parties have been part of the decision-making process. That has been subject to objections, too. I do not know whether you have looked at the scheme, but it is certainly one of the more complicated ones on the go at the moment, both financially and technically.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on slightly. You are going to produce a briefing on education and skills reform, which will help to inform, or to provide scoping for, audit work after the election. I have a specific question about colleges in that regard, because they have been very much in the news for a long time, particularly with regard to their fiscal sustainability, but I noticed that, in your plans, you talk about publishing a briefing in October this year. A briefing is not an audit, and yet the colleges are such an important element of what we are looking at. Is there a possibility of upgrading the briefing in order to take a more comprehensive approach to looking at colleges?
In previous parliamentary sessions, we have had a very comprehensive audit across the whole span of colleges, including all the link-ups between colleges and information on how they are all doing. Rather than seeing them one by one, we saw them altogether and could therefore understand the whole issue around colleges and what they face, because one size does not fit all and not all colleges are in the same state.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Colin Beattie
According to your overview, you expect to publish that report in November 2025.