The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2569 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I will start with a question about tribunals. There has been an increase in the use of the additional support needs tribunal by something like two thirds in recent years, which is an awful lot. As I understand it, there is no requirement for mediation to take place, so the parents or whoever can go straight to the tribunal. Is that an efficient approach? Should there be a requirement to first seek mediation before going to the tribunal?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
We hear about circumstances where some pupils who receive ASL can be disruptive, at times, in the classroom. Is there any evaluation of what impact that has overall on the educational outcomes of those who do not receive ASL?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
It is not a train smash. It can be done, if that is the right thing to do.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
However, there is no intention to make mediation a mandatory step in the process.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Neil Rennick said that there is a requirement for local authorities to provide or make available mediation, but there is no requirement for that as part of the process. If the parents or whoever want to go straight to the tribunal, they can do that. Is that the most efficient way to do it? Surely mediation should be a requirement before going to the tribunal.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. I will move on.
Mainstream ASL provision has an impact on other pupils who are getting education. Has there been any evaluation of any impact on the learning outcomes for pupils who do not receive ASL?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
I get the impression that there is not great enthusiasm to make mediation a mandatory step.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
It is a bit like a complaints process, is it not? You have to go through the steps, and mediation could logically be one of those steps. It will not work for everybody, but surely greater use of mediation would take some of the strain off the tribunal. We might not be talking about a huge number of people, but the tribunal process takes up a huge amount of time and cost. Mediation frequently works.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Does having such broad categories not lead to a certain amount of uniformity in the approach—a one-size-fits-all approach?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Are all those categories laid down by the Scottish Government? Are they in guidelines, or are they set in legislation?