The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2023
Colin Beattie
The report states that, in July 2020, the concept of remote jury centres was successfully piloted in Glasgow and Edinburgh, and it was implemented. The Scottish Government gave the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service an additional £12 million to implement the remote jury centre model. Was a value-for-money assessment carried out before that additional funding was required?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
At the moment, even if the amount in an account was very small, would banks not advise the creditors about the account anyway?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
I will move on to information disclosure orders. The power to make regulations in relation to information disclosure orders is legislated for already in the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc (Scotland) Act 2007. That power has not been utilised, but the Scottish Government is now proposing to take that forward. The intention is that creditors would be able to seek information about a debtor’s assets from third parties. It is argued that that will improve transparency so that creditors can identify who can pay and so forth.
There are recommendations about how information disclosure orders could work in practice, and there would be a requirement for the creditor to use some sort of agent—perhaps a solicitor or sheriff officer. However, the debtor would not be informed of the action, in case they moved their assets, so it would be done in the background. Initially, disclosure orders would cover only private bodies rather than public sector bodies. It seems strange to me that it would not include public sector bodies, because that would seem to be quite a wide area that is not being tapped into. What are your views on including public sector bodies and the appropriateness of implementing that power?
I will give Barry Mochan another chance to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
Katie, is there any chance that you can answer that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
Alisdair MacPherson, welcome back. [Laughter.]
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
Let us move on to Katie then.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
Would it add to the burden on creditors? They will receive all these pieces of paper—whether it is done on actual paper or electronically—back from the banks and so on, which will add considerably to their admin.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
No pressure here. [Laughter.]
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
Good morning. I would like to explore a couple of areas. The first is about the arrestee duty of disclosure. The bill would require a person or body that receives an arrestment request to inform the creditor where it is unsuccessful. That will add to the existing information disclosure process for a successful request. A number of respondents raised concerns about the increased burdens and costs on arrestees. I was particularly struck with NatWest, which said that it receives about 70,000 arrestment requests every year, the vast majority of which fail. That is just one business, but if we look across the whole field at all the banks and other institutions that would be involved, the amount of paper that would be flying back and forward would create a burden, not just for the arrestees but possibly also for creditors, who would be receiving all the responses.
I have two questions. First, do you agree with the concerns about the extra burden that will come into the system? Secondly, it has been suggested that requiring arrestees to respond only to proactive requests for information from creditors would be a more proportionate way forward.
I ask Barry Mochan whether he has a comment on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Colin Beattie
In that case, we will pass it across to David Menzies.