The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2424 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Again, in self-assessment liabilities, it would appear—and I am interpreting this, so correct me—that the deduction of
“£57 million to estimate Scotland’s share of other relevant Self Assessment balances where specific data are not available”,
is presumably based on a UK-wide average.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
It is in paragraph 1.9. There are a number of other cases—I will not bore you by going into them one by one—where UK-wide data is being used. That has to be incredibly skewed because the south-east of England skews everything.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
I do not think that we are questioning whether it has done a good job. It is a question of its value for money as a stand-alone regulator.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Looking at the overall picture, we can see that there have been quite comprehensive changes in WICS. There have been changes of personnel at senior level and changes in processes and almost everything you can think about. Have either WICS or the Scottish Government undertaken any assessment to determine the extent of the issues that have been reported in, for example, the section 22 report and the spin-off from that. Huge efforts have been required to address the issues. Have they impacted on the ability of WICS to perform its regulatory role? I am not sure who would want to come in on that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Coming back to the point, have you done any assessment as to its value for money?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Yes, it is for the Scottish Government.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
What is the penalty?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
Maybe you could tell us a few.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
To be honest, the reasons that you are giving are fairly thin. There are many different ways—well, not many, but there are a few—to approach this. I speak from my experience in the private sector and, in general, I have never seen or heard of unlimited expenses—taking the cap off—and relying on individuals to decide whether something is value for money and to determine their own flights and all the rest of it. That does not happen.
12:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Colin Beattie
I am relieved to hear that, but opening up a six-month window that could potentially allow a free for all does not sound like the best way forward. I would question why the audit and risk committee would even consider putting that forward to the board. To me that is also unheard of.