The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2831 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
How do you engage with councils on existing projects such as the Musselburgh flood protection system, which is in my constituency? A number of schemes that I have looked at, including that one, started at one size and gradually grew legs and became much bigger. As far as I can see, those changes are developed locally, and it seems that there is no Government co-operation, oversight or input into that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Some of Mr Boyd’s comments lead on to my final question. There has been some suggestion that the criteria for assessing major flood schemes might favour more affluent areas. That might be because the criteria look at capital values or whatever; I do not know what the criteria are, but that is the suggestion that has been made. Which criteria might be used to appraise investment in future flood schemes in terms of value for money, but also taking into account inequalities and wider benefits? Perhaps Mr Boyd might like to comment on that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I would like to talk a little bit about funding for the major flood schemes. The Auditor General’s report indicates that
“the funding mechanism for major flood schemes is not fit for purpose”.
That is quite a strong statement. The report also says that the funding mechanisms lack the appropriate safeguards to manage risks relating to delays and cost increases. That is worrying, given the nature of what we are facing. What mechanisms will be put in place to ensure that future risks of delays and cost increases are better managed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Thank you. I will leave it there, convener.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. Is the internal audit being done in-house?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I mean, £1 million is a lot of errors. What is the total balance sheet for the college?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Is the cause of those errors related to the issues within the finance area?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
I will move on a little. Your report mentions that UHI raised concerns with the college following identification of the errors. Was that the first time that UHI had raised concerns with the college?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Perhaps you could comment on whether a common theme underlies the reasons behind the failures.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Colin Beattie
Can you comment on the fact that all those resignations took place within a fairly tight period in 2025?