The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2569 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
That brings me to the last question on data. Are you satisfied with what the Scottish Government is doing to improve primary care data and provide the infrastructure to support it? The issue has to be resolved.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
On a similar theme, the Scottish Government made transitionary payments in 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. Is there any explanation for why all practices received transitionary payments, including those that had access to MDTs? That does not seem right.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
How effective the approach has been is a question that has been asked for several years. Is that all about money or is it about will?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Is there any indication that the GP surgeries are prepared to give out that information?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
My last question is about GP head count. In paragraph 81, you say that there is not enough
“information about the number of hours worked by GPs”,
which seems extraordinary. Apparently, there is evidence that
“the average number of sessions worked by GPs”
was measured at 6.4 sessions in 2017 but that
“by March 2024, this had decreased to 6.2.”
That does not sound like a huge decrease, but if we multiply it across the country, it is perhaps a lot more significant. Given the pressure that GPs are under, why do we not know how many hours they are putting into the job? Why can we not evaluate that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Yes.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Will the survey be changed this year to ensure that more robust data is being collected?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Did you say that a survey is going out?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
Estimated?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Colin Beattie
That goes back to the problem that you do not have the data to prove the point. Do we have accurate figures for doctors who work part time, to understand what part of the mix they are?
10:45