The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2597 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
On that particular point, you said “each college”. Does that mean that there is no common approach and that there could be differences in the formula, for want of a better word, that colleges use to determine which courses to retain?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
There must be a practical situation whereby colleges’ financial position is going to improve as a result of the changes. That is the purpose of the changes—to give the colleges flexibility and the ability to improve their situation. You must have done a projection as to what the changes will achieve.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
Thank you, convener.
I would like to cover a couple of topics, one of which is potential staff reductions, which my colleague Graham Simpson mentioned. It is clear that staff are a college’s biggest expense. That is not a surprise, given the nature of the business that colleges are in. However, some colleges know that they need to make—or potentially need to make—significant staffing reductions. Some of those are fairly extreme.
I have a couple of questions to ask. I do not know whether you will have an answer to the first one.
First, part of the increase in staff costs is the result of the cost of living negotiations with the union. Those costs are not insignificant. However, there is also the fixed element of staff increments every year. Unless a person is at the top of their grade, they will receive a certain increment each year. I do not know how much that would be—typically, the figure that I have seen elsewhere is 3 or 5 per cent. What element of the increase in staff costs are the fixed costs that come every year? I realise that there will be a slight difference each year, but roughly what proportion is that increase in comparison with the cost of living increases?
Secondly, I think that trying to maintain a quality curriculum has already been mentioned. Given the sheer depth of some of the potential staff cuts, there will still be an impact on the curriculum even if they are mitigated to an extent. How will you prioritise which part of the curriculum to retain and which part to cease? That is quite a difficult thing to ask. I do not know who wants to come in on that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
I would have thought that understanding the level of fixed commitment every year would be quite an important element in terms of increases in staff costs.
09:45Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
I will come back to the first question to which you responded. On the first portion of your answer, it is quite logical for colleges to continually review their courses and what they offer to the market. However, we are talking about something quite different here—we are talking about a forced reduction in the number of courses that are offered. Do colleges raise the bar so that there is a change in the criteria under which a course might be offered, with the result that not enough people apply for it? Instead of having X number of people applying, which would have been fine previously, the bar is raised and only the more popular courses are offered. Gradually, we will see shrinkage through that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
I will move on to a slightly different aspect. The SFC has introduced a new funding distribution model and new guidance, which are supposed to give colleges better flexibility and greater opportunity to respond to local needs. I believe that the Scottish Government is looking at the possibility of further changes in college funding arrangements. Perhaps you can summarise where you are on that at the moment. Are the Scottish Government and the SFC giving colleges enough clarity on their priorities within the funding that is available to them?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
You must have projected what the practical financial implications of that will be for colleges. What is the financial impact going to be?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Colin Beattie
We have talked about potential further changes. Do we have any timescale on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Colin Beattie
Divergence in certain areas is, perhaps, not unreasonable, given the devolved settlement and so on, but “wildly different” is a fairly extreme statement for anyone to make. Do you agree with that statement?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
Colin Beattie
During its evidence taking, the committee has looked at aspects of the development of the just transition plans and at how joined-up they are. What co-ordination has there been between the Scottish Government, the UK Government and local authorities, for example? Do the plans align with those different layers of government?