The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2831 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
What is the target for delayed discharges versus the actuality?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
It certainly seems to be a huge deficiency if NHS Tayside cannot take the workforce with it. I will leave it at that, convener.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
Are they actively working on coming up with a plan?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. I will move on a little bit to look at the change programme in support of “Living Life Well”. You comment that there is
“a lack of capacity for staff to lead and participate in change”
and that
“The new models of care workstreams and priorities had not yet been agreed, and there was not yet a clear delivery plan in place with specific actions, timescales and costs.”
You also say that the change programme is “overly complex”—I would like to understand that complexity a little bit more—and that it lacks a “clear delivery plan”. I am interested to hear more about the delivery plan that NHS Tayside is thinking of.
Finally, in your view, what needs to be done urgently to make the programme deliverable?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
Before they come in, I have one question for you based on what you have said. Things are not moving as fast as they should be. Is there a willingness among the different stakeholders to work positively together towards a solution?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
This may be my last question. Apparently, there has not been much in the way of engagement with the workforce workstream. The report mentions that
“In October 2024, a review of progress acknowledged that this was not meeting as a formal workstream but reported that staff engagement was under way across the change programme ... It also acknowledged that there lacked a systematic approach to staff engagement.”
What improvements does the WSCP have to do to make engagement meaningful and ensure that staff engagement is incorporated going forward?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
The report shows that mental health delayed discharges generally decreased, but delayed discharges in learning disability services were high. Is there a reason why the figure is particularly high compared with regular mental health delayed discharges? I am not sure whether you would say “regular mental health discharges”, but you understand what I am getting at there. Why the differentiation, and why is there a specific issue with learning disability services?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
Presumably—Eva Thomas-Tudo might be able to comment on this—it is not actually a systemic problem; it is simply supply in the community that is the problem.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
You will be pleased to know that I will not be referring to the letter. However, I do want to look at governance and implementation, which is clearly an area that has been shown to have certain weakness.
There seems to be no doubt that members and organisations are all committed to the Promise—that does seem sure—but the Auditor General’s report makes it clear that there is a lack of
“a consistent and shared understanding of what delivering The Promise would look like, and how this would be achieved, by 2030.”
There seems to be no real shared understanding of what the Promise is, in some ways, or how it will be delivered. The different organisations seem to have different nuances in that respect. What is being done to enable that shared understanding of what the Promise means across the different organisations?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Colin Beattie
Is there not a risk of huge fragmentation?