The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 485 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I could probably go further on that point for quite some time, but I am aware of time. We will have to come back to that as we see the effect of the decision.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Some do. You referred to the racist riots last year, which were sparked by online misinformation, propaganda and racism; they were quite deliberately stirred up in that way. Some people will tell the difference between truth and lies when they see it and some people will understand that social media content is not going to be honest or reliable, but others will not.
On your point about the responsibility of the broadcasters, this week the main regulated broadcasters covering a Reform Party press conference just broadcast its racist film about Anas Sarwar, uncritically and unquestioningly; the cameras turned to the projection of that film and it was broadcast to the nation on regulated mainstream news channels.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. Sorry, not sorry: I will come back to “River City” for a couple of questions first but then I will move on to the recent announcement on regional production.
You have said clearly that ending “River City” was an editorial decision and I accept that that was the motivating factor, but one thing that has left a bad taste in the mouth for the people who received that distressing news was their strong perception that they had been misinformed that the landlord wanted to sell the site for housing. If we can tie that off and put that issue to rest, I would welcome that. Can you confirm whether the “River City” team were told that? If they were not told that, how has the perception arisen that they were misled?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I am not asking if you personally were responsible for where that suggestion came from.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Was the BBC responsible for that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
It is a more modest change perhaps, then?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Good morning. I will follow up the same theme that Emma Harper started and that Joe Fitzpatrick continued: the list of treatments that you have made clear is non-exhaustive, not prescriptive and can be changed. Specific issues might have been considered for such a list but have not been included, such as harm reduction. There are those who make a case for heroin-assisted treatment not as a default, but because it has been shown to be effective in certain circumstances and successive UK Governments have allowed it. I am interested in exploring not only that but the question whether any list—even a non-prescriptive, non-exhaustive one—is the right way to go.
You said that the bill would increase the range of treatments that are available. Although you might be strongly of the view that it would increase the pressure on Government and public sector bodies to invest in capacity, it would not actually increase the range of treatments that are available. You also said that it would empower individuals to access the treatment that they believe is right for them, but the bill’s achieving what you have described would not sit well, it seems, with the points that you have just made about clinical judgment in each case.
Surely, any bill that is composed of a list, as this one is, will place an emphasis on the things that are included in the list and risk de-emphasising others. Effectively, providing a list makes a political judgment in place of what should be a clinical judgment. By taking a list-based approach, are we not mistaking a political judgment for what should be a clinical one?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Nicotine can lead to people dying.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
Thank you for the clarity. I am still a little unclear about the rationale for saying that intoxication, as such, determines the right to access the treatment considered under the terms of the bill. New substances are coming on to the market all the time, and a drug could come along that is lethal and highly addictive but that does not cause intoxication leading to a loss of control. I do not want to overstate the issue, as it may have been considered already during a previous evidence session, but it is a little unclear to me why intoxication—which is clearly a relevant safety issue in road traffic offences—is relevant to people’s access to addiction recovery services.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Patrick Harvie
I see.